Arguments Against Voter Identification Laws

1159 Words3 Pages

The ability to vote is one of the most fundamental rights offered by our constitution, and it is intrinsically valuable to our democracy. Preventing voter fraud is essential to the stability of our political system, and that must be achieved while simultaneously not encumbering the voters with stipulations. Voter Identification laws and regulations have created intense controversy in both the public arena and political sphere. Voter identification laws require voters on election day to show specific forms of government-issued identification before casting a ballot. (Sobel et al. 2009) Those in support of voter identification laws and regulations often assert that these laws discourage fraudulently cast votes, and preserve the integrity of our elections. Generally, those who argue against voter identification laws suggest these laws are discriminatory in nature and are put forth to legally suppress lawful voters. Often the opponents of these laws liken them to previously found unconstitutional methods to suppress voter turnout. While giving a speech at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) convention then Attorney General Eric Holder chastised the states that began to turn away registered …show more content…

The study suggests that an individual’s degree of belief of voter fraud correlates to their political ideology. Republican voters are more likely to believe in widespread voter fraud and support for voter identification laws has increased in the examined time frame. Also, the inverse is true, democratic voters believe tend to believe that there is less voter fraud, and attitudes towards opposing voter identification laws have strengthened in the examined time frame. Many allegations of voter fraud have turned up in the media over the years, but when the facts are scrutinized often they fall short of the

Open Document