Arguments Against Animal Testing

562 Words2 Pages

Over half of the world's population thinks to do testing on animals is fine. I personally believe that animal testing is not alright and it shouldn’t be happening. Animals deserve to live their life without having to be tested on. Over twenty million animals are tested on in the United States. People think that testing on chimpanzees, mice, rabbits, and monkeys is alright. They think this because, Chimpanzees share most of their DNA with humans and mice share some genetic similarities to humans. Another pro to testing on animals is that animal testing has helped to find life saving cures and treatments. Chri Abee, director of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center’s animal research facility, states that, “we wouldn’t have a vaccine for hepatitis B without chimpanzees and he says that the use of chimps is our best hope for finding a vaccine for hepatitis C. Hepatitis C is a disease that kills 15,000 Americans annually. Rats and mice are basically set up for research because of their short lifespans. They only live up to two or three years. …show more content…

Ninety percent of the drugs that pass in animals tend to fail in humans. A 2009 peer- review study found serious flaw in the majority of publicly funded U.S. and U.K. animal studies using rodents and primates. It also showed that eighty-seven percent of the studies failed to randomize the selection of animals and eighty-six percent did not use blinding. (Blinding is another technique to reduce researcher bias.) Over hundreds of the drugs designed to treat strokes worked when they tested them on animals, but completely failed in

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Open Document