Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cons to animal testing
Why animal testing is necessary
Cons to animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cons to animal testing
Over half of the world's population thinks to do testing on animals is fine. I personally believe that animal testing is not alright and it shouldn’t be happening. Animals deserve to live their life without having to be tested on. Over twenty million animals are tested on in the United States. People think that testing on chimpanzees, mice, rabbits, and monkeys is alright. They think this because, Chimpanzees share most of their DNA with humans and mice share some genetic similarities to humans. Another pro to testing on animals is that animal testing has helped to find life saving cures and treatments. Chri Abee, director of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center’s animal research facility, states that, “we wouldn’t have a vaccine for hepatitis B without chimpanzees and he says that the use of chimps is our best hope for finding a vaccine for hepatitis C. Hepatitis C is a disease that kills 15,000 Americans annually. Rats and mice are basically set up for research because of their short lifespans. They only live up to two or three years. …show more content…
Ninety percent of the drugs that pass in animals tend to fail in humans. A 2009 peer- review study found serious flaw in the majority of publicly funded U.S. and U.K. animal studies using rodents and primates. It also showed that eighty-seven percent of the studies failed to randomize the selection of animals and eighty-six percent did not use blinding. (Blinding is another technique to reduce researcher bias.) Over hundreds of the drugs designed to treat strokes worked when they tested them on animals, but completely failed in
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
In fact, it’s rare for the drugs that are tested on animals to be safe for humans. 95% of drugs fail in human trials, despite passing animal test, whether it be because the drug didn’t work or it was not safe for consumption. Really, testing cosmetics or other kinds of drug on any animal that isn’t a primate lacks sufficient statistical insight. Also, most pharmaceutical drugs have an abundance of side-effects, unfortunately, animal testing can only predict only 19% of the 93 possible. Finally, the most popular animals used in testing our mice and rats, which make up for 81% of the animals killed each year from animal research, when used in test are only 43% accurate for the safety of drugs used for
Back in the 1850s, Charles Darwin proposed a theory suggesting animals be an appropriate model to facilitate more accurate biological understandings for the human race. Since then, nonhuman primates, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, mice, rabbits, etc. have been tested on in laboratories in the hope of gaining a better knowledge of the human body. With that being said, many arguments have risen in relationship to this topic. Some of which claim to be the advances in medicine that have occurred since animal testing has begun, while others focus on the inhumane tactics and procedures that these helpless animals endure. As a result, this hot topic continues to be argued with no resolutions. In the meantime, multitudes of animals continue to die in laboratories. To focus on one specific animal, being nonhuman primates, one may look at the similar DNA patterns in comparison to humans. The 98% similitude causes researchers and scientists to believe that these are prime candidates to test on. As a result,
are used every year for testing and not many of them stay alive after testing. A lot of mice and rats are used for testing because there are so many of them. Also, chimpanzees are used often because they are an animal species that relates to humans the most (Bekoff). Other
Animal testing is an immoral, heinous, atrocious act. One should never put an animal before his own life; we are all here on earth due to some strand of evolution or the other, making prejudice and other discriminations (man or not) obsolete and meaningless. Those who would think themselves above another creature are each failures in their own individual way. The rights of animals cannot be questioned, it is an inalienable fact that most do not understand, when given thought that is free of bias and the plague of arrogance, as Arthur Schopenhauer once said: “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.” In a society as unquestionably advanced as man, a society in which even the consumption of meat is an indulgence and in no way necessary, the duty of treating all life with anything more than a central nervous system is nothing less than a law.
For thousands of years, animals have been used to test procedure, vaccines, and medicine to see their reaction prior to using them on humans. This allows these medicines, vaccines, and procedures to be reviewed and accepted by government before making them available to the public. Many medicines have potentially harmful side effects and testing on animals allows scientists to identify these side effects and let the consumer know prior to receiving and taking the medication. During this testing process, many animals react poorly to some medications or vaccines and doctors realize that those will not work for humans. This saves the loss of human life and sickness but what about the animals? It is estimated that 26 million animals are used to test in every year in the United States alone (ProCon). All sorts of animals are used to test from chickens to chimpanzees. Chimpanzees are often used due to the similarity of their DNA to human DNA. It is believed that humans developed from chimpanzee like animals over millions of years. Some animals experience the harmful effects of these tests and many die from them. Animals do not have the ability to consent to these types
Animal testing was started in the 1800’s for creating vaccines for children, the animals they started testing on were monkeys, mice, and guinea pigs. Based off Charles Darwin’s idea that humans are closely linked to primates we based the idea that animal testing would benefit us. (Animal Testing) Animal testing has caused pain and relief alike. On one hand innocent animals are dying on the other we are creating vaccines to save animals and humans alike.
Animal testing has been a highly debated topic in recent years. There are many people who have finally started to speak their minds and tell how they feel about testing on animals. But just as there are those who oppose animal testing, there are those who fully support it. A majority of people who do not support animal testing provide valid facts and information for why it is not needed. Some of the facts that they provide revolve around the conditions that the animals have to endure in the testing labs. The Animal Welfare Act lays out rules about how animals are allowed to be tortured, beaten, maimed, and all sorts of other things as long as they get pain relief. Those who oppose animal testing also provide facts that show how unreliable the
If you had the choice to live or die, which would you choose? If you had the alternative to live in a cage or in a house which would you select? If you had the option to have experiments that caused you pain preformed on you would you? The truth is that most of us would rather live, reside in a house and would not be a part of an experiment that caused us pain. However, most people accept the elements of the above conditions for animals. Animals should not be a part of the pain and horrific conditions that humans put them through. We shouldn’t just let these innocent animals suffer and die to save human lives, when we could find other ways to treat diseases.
The way I look at animal testing is a form hateful cruelty. None of these people care about if it hurts or kills the animals. The cruelty has been going on long enough and I think it is time to stop. What people do not know is that animal’s react a different way to drugs as humans do, so scientist cannot apply the results to humans. Many animals go through screaming, unbearable, horrific; you cannot even imagine pain when they go through test for products that you use every day such as: Cosmetics, Household Products, Medical Products, even Iams dog products. Some well-known animals that are use for testing are: cats, dogs, mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, gerbils, sheep, llamas, cattle, owls, deer, monkeys and other primates. These are not, by any means, all of the animals that they use. These are just the most common ("Animal Rights: Animal Testing"). Animals cannot tell you that something hurts, but they can scream to let the scientist know, but none of them care that it hurts them so bad. Some scientist do not see that countless animals suffer and die, or that it is just plain wrong. These animals suffer, feel pain, hurt and want to live as we do. These companies have burned the skin off some animals, mutilated some bunnies’ ears, poisoned the mice, punching puppies in the face, drip a substance in bunnies eyes, and the suffering and dying of these animals has gone on too long.
Testing on the animals is conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Some of the tests that researchers do on the animals are biomedical research, transplantation, drug testing and toxicology testing, cosmetics and other animal testing that are used for directional research, breeding and defense research. Organizations like PETA and BUVA think it is not a necessity for this testing. They think it is cruel, poor scientific practice, poorly regulated and that animals used for experimentation have an intrinsic right not to be used for experimentation. Many Americans don’t agree with testing on animals.
One of the pros of animal testing are the scientific breakthroughs that have happened and life saving cures that have been found. Throughout the years, there have been many breakthroughs in the medical field; including; finding cures for diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and childhood leukemia. Discovering those cures have saved thousands upon thousands of adult and children lives. Another pro is that not many animals are used in the experimentation of medical research. “People in the United States eat 9 billion chickens and 150 million cattle, pigs and sheep annually, yet scientists only use around 26 million animals for research, 95% of which are rodents, birds and fish” (Holder, 1). Some animals are very similar to human beings, including monkeys, mice, and other rodents that share more than 97% genetics with human beings. Being so similar to other species means that the drug that is being tested on the animals may efficiently work on human beings as well, possibly with minor
At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.
When I first saw the topic for this discussion, I thought to myself “that’s a no-brainer” because my belief comes from a biblical viewpoint of God instructing man to “rule over the animals”. But, while researching this topic extensively over the last week, I will have to admit I could see both sides to this debate.
For many years there has been controversy whether or not animals should be tested on between scientists and animal right supporters. It is very debatable if animals should be tested on when a cure for a disease could be found from testing on animals. From my own personal view I have a huge heart for animals, but if we can not find other alternatives, and is possible we can find cures for diseases, then animals may be used for research, but only for medical reasons.