The Refugee Act was created in 1975. This was a policy that was implemented over time to assist and aide individuals in crisis within their own country. Some of the reasons the people left these countries were due to asylum, to escape the sex slavery, also people of domestic violence. There is a process that these individuals have to go through in order to be placed in a third country. These refugees have some form of security clearance due to the nature of their situation. Some, eventually get their families united with them after a period of time. During different administrations, Presidents would add to the act so that more individuals would qualify for the program. Recently the Obama administration added that members of the LGBT community would be able to enter into the resettlement act. Middle eastern countries are an example, due to their religious beliefs their people are not allowed to practice a lifestyle of being gay. If they are sought out they …show more content…
If a person has live (active) TB, a mental retardation, or Hansen’s disease they can be disqualified. They are not being screened for other health concerns during this process. “Refugees are increasingly migrating to urban areas, but little research has been conducted to compare health and wellbeing outcomes of urban refugees with those based in camps. (Journal of Refugee Studies, 2015) This resettlement act has its pros and cons just like any other program. It is up to the Federal government to have a plan of execution to make it the best. It needs to come up with a better solution on how to keep all states that receive majority of these refugees on board. No one can ever be a complete one hundred percent. A more extensive background and history check could eliminate the concerns of security for natives. The program was created to help those in need and assist with a new beginning at life outside the
Phillips, J. (2011), ‘Asylum seekers and refugees: What are the facts?’, Background note, Parliamentry library, Canberra.
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
By helping people in a third world country in a time of need, the United States is put at risk by allowing refugees in that could potentially be terrorists planning to attack. The United States should be more restrictive in admitting refugees. In order to commit terrorist attacks, people are posing as refugees. This is enabled because refugees do not get background checked. Also, refugees cost the host country a lot of money.
According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, refugee is a term applied to anyone who is outside his/her own country and cannot return due to the fear of being persecuted on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership of a group or political opinion. Many “refugees” that the media and the general public refer to today are known as internally displaced persons, which are people forced to flee their homes to avoid things such as armed conflict, generalized violations of human rights or natural and non-natural disasters. These two groups are distinctly different but fall ...
The people of the United States are compassionate and helpful most importantly, to those people with different cultures and beliefs. The United States in many cases must take in a large amount of people to live and to thrive as non-citizens, leading to overpopulation, the government must look beyond this perspective. The U.S. has had a lot of experience with refugees in the past and so forth. Therefore, “in a normal year, we resettle more than any other country. With the help of churches and other charitable groups, the newcomers generally adapt and integrate into society. Their children grow up Americans” (Chapman). Refugees can achieve a new life, furthermore, skills from which natives might gain and learn from. Accordingly, “Accepting refugees into the United States is one of our grandest traditions. And we’ve been doing it since the beginning even before we were a nation,” said Lee Williams, vice-president and chief financial officer of US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (Lauren). Williams is implying that, to recognize which Refugees will won’t be resettled considering their religion or national birthplace raises established and lawful problems, States cannot pick among outcasts. Refugees are outcasts but with more help, they will be able to fit into the American society with just being themselves as time changes and life goes
Syrian refugees they are one of the biggest topic of the world today. Many people want to let them in and many want to keep them out. Over the past years we have allowed many refugees in the US from war stricken countries. Just with the last shooting in San Bernardino that researchers says they were talking to ISIS and the bombing in Paris. That has made everyone so cautious about letting Syrian refugees in, but some of those people haven’t even been refugees. Still the government should still allow the syrian refugees in the country.
By relooking at the system and allocating resources better, both RMA and SSI can become great resources for refugees seeking coverage. Offering these resources means they need to effectively and consistently provide care to refugees who seek to utilize the system. Effective distribution is going to allow for the best utilization of resources and most consistent
Just because an individual falls into any one of the priority lists, does not mean that they are guaranteed citizenship of ever refugee status. The Immigration laws
For the next 90 days, refugees from these countries must show their arrival In the U.S. national interest this follows the March 6th executive order that banned refugees for 120 days unless they were already scheduled for travel. Homeland Security has reviewed the application process to prevent any exploitation by terrorists. Trump planned to halve the total number of refugees accepted to 50,000 per year. Federal judges stayed those orders. That gave the State Department the ability to increase the number of refugees to 70,000 in 2017. (written by
Not only is it lawfully wrong for a religious test to exist for the entry of refugees but also morally wrong because the U.S is a safe haven for many refugees of different religions, the First Amendment prohibits it and many religions exist in the United states already exist. The United States resettles more refugees than other countries; however, from 2009 to 2015 the number of refugees accepted per year has decreased by 5,000. In 2015 there was approximately 70,000 refugees admitted into the United States. As they stand now the refugees must undergo a process that includes extensive interviewing, screening, and a security clearance from four different federal agencies, the PRM, the ORR, DHS, and USCIS. These offices prioritize three categorizes
There are increasing amounts of people coming from the US hoping to get a refugee status granted to them
All refugees or foreigners are entitled to health care, to seek employment and to education (and further human rights), as stated in the Refugee Act, in the same way as South African citizens. It also states that all people in the country are entitled to the rights stated in Chapter Two of the constitution
As a concept that is becoming commonplace in mainstream society the concept or status or refugee is a concept of high importance in the anthropological study of conflict within and across borders as well as the impact this has on host societies. Refugee is officially defined by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) as a person “who has been forced to flee his or her country because of persecution, war, or violence. A refugee has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.” (UNHCR, 2016). Whilst this definition may initially come across as straight forward the concept of refugee is multifaceted and complicated as it often gets mixed
Immigration poses an ongoing debate in which people are becoming increasingly unsure as to whether immigrants are benefiting their society. This paper will examine three of the main benefits of immigration: the increase in diversity it provides, the rise in skills and labor and the benefits to the economy. Immigration leads to cross-cultural integration, therefore increasing ethnic variety. This increase in diversity is beneficial as it leads to improvements in society, as well as educational development. Increased immigration also means there are more skills and experts available to the hosting countries, as well as extra workers to take up jobs that need filling. Immigration also leads to improvements in the economy as taxes are paid and employment and wages increase.