Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism during the spanish american war
Imperialism in the spanish american war essay
Imperialism in the spanish american war essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism during the spanish american war
Is Diaz’s Account Reliable?
Before the 15th century, the Indians in the Americas were not connected with the world and would remain that way until Columbus's exploration. In the beginning of 15th century, the Aztecs were the dominant group in Mesoamerica leaded by Montezuma, the last leader, before the Spanish conquest. In 1519, Hernan Cortez led the Spanish mission to explore and conquer the New World. This paper will compare three primary sources about this event. First, an informing letter sent from Cortez to King Charles V, the king of Spain. Second, the Broken Spears which is an Indian recollection about the conquest of Mexico. Lastly, Bernal Diaz’s (one of Cortez’s men) account was written by him to share his experience with Aztec civilization. Moreover, this paper will show the credibility of Diaz’s account compared to the other sources because the objectivity of his tone, written after a while of the event, and the author’s great experience and his independent purpose of the source.
Diaz’s account is more believable because the objective tone of his account compared to the others. That was noticeable when he describes the events with many details without his emotions. Even, it is difficult to recognize his opinion about the event. For example, when he said “he placed it round the neck of the Great Montezuma and when he had so placed it he was going to embrace him, and those great Princes who accompanied Montezuma held back Cortés by the arm so that he should not embrace him, for they considered it an indignity” (Diaz, P. 2). On the other hand, the embellishing tone of Cortez’s letter makes it subjective in some parts when he explained the event. According to Cortez, he attacked two villages before it was dawn, but he d...
... middle of paper ...
... time means that he was educated. On the contrary, Cortez was a captain who had a mission he has to do. As well, he sent his letter to inform the king about the event and about his achievements and championship to justify his position with Spain rulers. However, The Broken Spears is a recollection of Spanish by unidentified Indians to show their fateful conflict. In sum, because Diaz wrote his book to tell the reading public about his experience with events, he is more reliable.
In conclusion, this paper showed that Diaz’s is more believable compared to the others for three reasons. First, the objectivity of his tone that he used, so it is difficult to recognize his point of view. Second, he wrote it after a while of the event, therefore he did not tend to his group on his writing. Finally, he wrote it to inform the public about his own experience with the Aztec.
Admittedly, these men are responsible for much of the exploration of the America’s, but to focus on so few of the explorers ignores how reactive their actions were, and the larger narrative of the world at that time (4). For example, Columbus is praised and idolized for discovering the America’s, however it was only by luck that he arrived on those shores. Moreover, there were many other explorers at the time who could have reached the America’s if Columbus had not done so first (9). Another man who is seen as the key figure in the actual Conquest is Cortes. Cortes’ campaign in the America’s is commonly viewed as the standard to strive for, yet it is also the exception to a typical conquest (19). He is viewed as some above-it-all conquistador idol, when in all actuality he merely followed the standard protocol of the Conquest (19). This does not mean that Cortes’ actions were any less inspirational, merely that they were not uncharacteristic acts that he created (19). Both Columbus and Cortes were merely following standard procedure of the time, yet they are written about as if they were heroes of their time, bravely going and doing what none had done before. And in some sense, they were the first to discover and conquer, but it is foolish to assume that just because they were the first to be in the America’s
In this chapter, he is bringing light to our current vision that the conquistadores were hand picked by the king in other to serve a greater propose. According to Restall the “Army” we know today was not created until the late 17th century. Through out this paragraph, Restall shows, that this myth was also brought to life trough narratives and letters. Many, if not all were regular men, without military experience. He uses of a historical time line to prove that it was not until after the military revolution that the Spanish started speaking of conquistadores as solders. In this chapter, Restall mentioned that the conquistadores were merchants, artisans and farmers that saw in the new world a chance to change their life and the way they live. Most of them were not directed or funded by the
The Broken Spears is a book written by Miguel Leon-Portilla that gives accounts of the fall of the Aztec Empire to the Spanish in the early 16th century. The book is much different from others written about the defeat of the empire because it was written from the vantage point of the Aztecs rather then the Spanish. Portilla describes in-depth many different reasons why the Spanish were successful in the defeat of such a strong Empire.
One of the many characteristics that a hero needs to have is bravery. Cortez of course didn’t want what happen to happen, but he had the bravery to stand up to an Anglo sheriff to defend his brother. At the time that this happened, Anglos intimidated many Mexican-Americans who were living in Texas because of the tension that was there from the war. Mexican American were abused and mistreated because of the language barrier that wasthere was between them. This...
In this biographical paper, I will be exploring the history of Juan Cortina, a man who is a hero or bandit depending on who you ask, his historical significance, and then exploring what we know of Juan and what we can deduce about his personality.
Jacques Lafaye, a French historian, published a study pertaining to the intellectual history of New Spain and its development of a national consciousness that would facilitate a move towards independence. Lafaye takes a unique approach of examining the formation of Mexico’s national conciseness by pointing to the importance of religious thought in that process. In this ethnohistorical study the author pays special attention to the interaction of Iberian Christianity and Aztec belief system in New Spain. Through careful analysis the author confronts the merging of these two faiths and their role in the transition from the Aztec world to independent Mexico. Lafaye specifically alludes to the syncretic nature of St.Thomas-Quetzalcoatl and Guadalupe-Tonantzin
The Aztec Empire was the most powerful Mesoamerican kingdom of all time. They dominated the valley of Mexico in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The Aztecs were an advanced and successful civilization that built beautiful, sophisticated cities, temples, and pyramids. They also created a culture full of creativity with mythological and religious traditions. Aztecs lead a structured and evocative life that let their society to become a very superior civilization. The Aztec’s communication skills were very well developed for their time; through religious beliefs, government involvement, and family life they lived a full and productive life. Until in 1519 when the Spanish conquistadors arrived in Mexico, and defeated the Aztecs.
José de la Cruz Porfirio Díaz Mori was born on September 15, 1830, in Oaxaca, Mexico. He was born a “mestizo”, which is a person from a mixed Indian-European Heritage. He was born into a family that had very little money. Diaz was so poor that his family could not afford for him to finish school, which was a prime reason for his struggle in life. Diaz was not very literate, so he found that the army was more suitable to his demeanor. Diaz became a prisoner of war in 1863, which was an unfortunate time in his life, but through his demise he escaped and became a commander in Juarez’s Army. He led Mexico to many victories against the French Army, most importantly the Battle of Puebla. This battle is still recognized to this day as the Cinco de Mayo. “He initially wanted to become a priest but didn't finished his carrier and switch to study law. Later on he abandoned his carrier and become a soldier do to the problems in Mexico”(Diego De Leon). This shows the severity of how different someone can become because of power. Early on in life, Diaz wanted to become a priest, then he got the taste of power. Once Diaz got the taste of power, he realized that he wants to be superior to everyone else. T...
...ish when they first compose Mexico, then more tardy by American historians not lately this hundred. The removal of these texts is incredibly disquieted in bear a “unity” for the SMS, and that of the irrational variance in the translations of these texts their “personalities” are sufficiently clear. In deduction I would preference to arrange out that while there are many similarities between these texts, most of them are either in trivial blaze-impartial, uniform level they have in general, or how our association examines them as an interval of gaze aged enlightenment.
The Black Legend and White Legend: Relationship Between the Spanish and Indians in the New World
Little is known about Pedro de Cieza de Leon’s youth. Historians have discovered that Pedro de Cieza de Leon was a Spaniard, a conquistador, and a writer of Peru’s history. Pedro de Cieza de Leon was not well educated and had only the most basic education from his local school parish (Atlantis). Although he did not have a superior education, his four part book is reliable because he wrote about what he observed as a conquistador. This document is full of interesting information for the reader to discover the Inca’s way of living.
I had a very difficult time reading the Adventures in the Unknown Interior of America, I constantly found myself blanking out or just skimming the pages. The autobiography was boring and repetitive, it didn’t fully grasp my attention. The writing was mundane, though it provided a perceptive understanding of the failed expedition. Cabeza de Vaca’s writing style is brief. I find that he would start the narrative off with, “Today, the next day, a few days later, then this happened, or next to this, and etc.” it would begin like this on every paragraph or so. It annoyed me how there was so much jumping around from day to day, there wasn’t much detail where he focused on one event. But, I did find that there were times where he did focus on some merely recorded happenings, which were probably enhanced to make it seem believable and realistic. Plus, a lot of events during the expedition and customs of the Indians seemed factually inaccurate. Furthermore, it left me with too many unanswered questions that exhausted me.
“The Conquest of New Spain” is the first hand account of Bernal Diaz (translated by J.M. Cohen) who writes about his personal accounts of the conquest of Mexico by himself and other conquistadors beginning in 1517. Unlike other authors who wrote about their first hand accounts, Diaz offers a more positive outlook of the conquest and the conquistadors motives as they moved through mainland Mexico. The beginning chapters go into detail about the expeditions of some Spanish conquistadors such as Francisco Hernandez de Cordoba, Juan de Grijalva and Hernando Cotes. This book, though, focuses mainly on Diaz’s travels with Hernando Cortes. Bernal Diaz’s uses the idea of the “Just War Theory” as his argument for why the conquests were justifiable
Cortés came not to the New World to conquer by force, but by manipulation. Bernal Díaz del Castillo, in the "Conquest of New Spain," describes how Cortés and his soldiers manipulated the Aztec people and their king Montezuma from the time they traveled from Iztapalaopa to the time when Montezuma took Cortés to the top of the great Cue and showed him the whole of Mexico and its countryside, and the three causeways which led into Mexico. Castillo's purpose for recording the mission was to keep an account of the wealth of Montezuma and Mexico, the traditions, and the economic potential that could benefit Cortés' upcoming conquest. However, through these recordings, we are able to see and understand Cortés' strategy in making Mexico "New Spain." He came as a wolf in a sheep's clothing and manipulated Montezuma through his apparent innocence.
Victors and Vanquished by Stuart Schwartz attempts to explore differing perspectives of the conquest of Mexico as the historical narratives are from both the outlook of the Spanish conquistadors as well as the Nahua peoples. In these primary sources, there was a fundamental focus on the encounters between the Spaniards and the Mexica. The first source is an excerpt from The True History of the Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Díaz del Castillo, a Spanish conquistador, who participated as a foot solider in the conquest of Mexico with Hernán Cortés. Although Díaz del Castillo was a witness of the conquest, he wrote his account of what he had witnessed decades after the Spanish victory, in 1521. In his account, Díaz del Castillo concentrated on the ways in which the Spanish viewed the Nahua peoples. The second source is taken from the Florentine Codex and is one which was collected twenty