Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and roles of women in literature
Gender and roles of women in literature
Gender role in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Through The Last of the Crazy People and Spadework, Timothy Findley portrays the consequences of the increased anonymity associated with urbanization. In these two texts, rural communities are portrayed as having a strong sense of community and consequently, a limited level of anonymity. In a rural setting, an individual’s identity is largely inherited and imposed: a person’s character was constructed by those around them, before the person has the opportunity to define who they are. Anonymity is defined as "the state or quality of be anonymous" (Oxford), and anonymous is defined as "having no known name" or "lacking individual characteristics; unexceptional" (Oxford). In these two texts, Timothy Findley criticizes the monotonous and inconspicuous …show more content…
We consider these activities as destructive forms of behaviour. In In The Last of the Crazy People, Findley constructs a community where individuals are reduced to their contribution to society. Unemployed, Gilbert’s lack of “meaning” or worth eventually descends into self destructive behaviours. , Gilbert indulges in these immoral behaviours as a means to an end: he manipulates the anonymity of living within a city to act in an unethical way. Gilbert’s admittance that he “wants to be stopped” indicates that his behaviour is artificial: it is a desperate performance to derive purpose in his daily life. This reinforces the argument that Gilbert takes advantage of anonymity to partake in these negative behaviours. Given the personal independence and lack of governance
In The Last of the Crazy People, the main protagonist Hooker ultimately sees anonymity as an escape: it affords him a level of freedom that he otherwise would not have.
The boys at Markham College, and the teachers there, were to be strangers to him - and he would never tell them anything. Never. He was free. He gazed imperiously at the houses, knowing that soon he would be a stranger to them as well - that no one, anywhere in town, would know him. (Findley,
The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide
In 1919, Sherwood Anderson composed his work Winesburg Ohio, which depicts the inner lives of small-town America. Anderson’s fascination to explore what’s beneath the surface of human lives results in another story in 1933 called “Death In The Woods”. These two works, incidentally, share a common theme of isolation. The characters in these works, are portrayed as “grotesques” or people who live their lives by one truth, thus living a life of falsehood and isolation from the rest of the world. This essay will examine the theme of isolation in the two works described, and will also relate it to Anderson’s idea of the “grotesque”.
In today’s world, we live in a society where we are subjected to follow rules, which are placed upon us by the society. Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to follow the ideals of other people, or pursue their ideals and go against the prevailing conventions. In “Selections from Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, the author talks about a man named McCandless who went into the Alaskan wilderness in order to find his true self. His journey was also to escape from the societal norms of society. A person who goes into the wilderness believes that they can live their life with brute simplicity. This gives them little to no time with the complicated problems of modern society. Likewise, in “Waiting for a Jew” by Jonathan Boyarin, the author talks about one’s aspiration to find their identity and purpose in the community. He conveys that religious places, like shul, allow an individual to develop a cross- cultural self. The desires and expectations placed upon us by the society shape our strategies of personal identity; therefore, instilling fears that cause us to identify in opposition to our prevailing conventions.
As “The Blue Hotel,” “The Displaced Person,” “Bernice Bobs her Hair,” and In Dubious Battle demonstrate, the outsiders in each story, though instilling an initial fear in the eyes of society, experience a sudden and considerable downfall in the end. Each of these defeats, some more extreme than others, result from a clash of society’s fixed guidelines with an outsider’s challenge of these rules. Whether this rebellion against society constitutes a conscious or unconscious effort, and whether the punishment results in justifiable or unjustifiable consequences, one pattern emerges. The outsider instills fear in the mind of the community, and as a defense mechanism, society takes it upon itself to conquer the stranger, leading to his or her ultimate downfall.
There is no hiding the provocative use of isolation in the novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Isolationism can be defined as a policy of remaining apart from the affairs or interests of other groups. Steinbeck uses people of different race, sex, and mental capabilities to uncover the isolation and alienation society throws down upon people who are different. Lennie, a main character in the novel, is mentally handicapped and must obey George in order to make a living. Lenny is a large man and an excellent worker, but due to his mental deficiency, he is isolated from the rest of the workers on the ranch. The incorporation of isolation and alienation in the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck is brilliantly used to open the eyes of the reader about the apathy shown towards people who are not lucky enough to be considered “normal” by society’s standards.
Ralph Ellison published the book ’Invisible Man’ at Random House in 1952 (Wright, Richard, Michel & and Claude 3). One time he fell sick and he decided to take some time away from work in order to recover. During this time, Ralph developed an inspiration to write a collection which later became the “Invisible Man’. In the book, the narrator starts off by saying that he is invisible, a form that is not physical, but it is a refusal of others to recognize his presence. Further, the narrator says that owing to his invisibility, he has had to keep off from the world to live underground, eventually vandalizing power from the Monopolated Light & Power Company (Wright et.al 117). However, the narrator realizes his importance despite his individuality complex, thus he decides to uphold his distinctiveness without sacrificing his dependability to the society. Finally, the narrator feels ready to leave his hiding place and face the world.
In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and The Trial, Ken Kesey and Franz Kafka describe the threat corrupt institutions in modern day society pose to the individual. The authors explore the dehumanizing and conforming effects of societal institutio...
The next unclear situation is when the Governess learns of Miles’ expulsion. This is one of the main mysteries within this story. The question, “What does it mean? The child’s dismissed his school,” is the only question that the reader has throughout the conversation between the Governess and Mrs. Grose (165). Even though their conversation does inform the reader that the school has “absolutely decline[d]” Miles, it doesn’t clarify what exactly he has done to be expelled (165). The Governess comments, “That he’s an injury to the others” and “to corrupt” are her own opinions as to why Miles was expelled (165, 166). Nevertheless, her comment does not help the reader in any way because the remark in and of itself is unclear. Her first comment suggests that Miles might be causing physical harm to other students but her second ...
Identity, in today’s society, is often taken for granted. We have the ability to be anything we wish to be and act in any way we wish to act, but in the novel 1984 by George Orwell, identity is not taken for granted because it does not exist at all. Winston Smith, the narrator, lives in a dystopian society based on the idea of totalitarian government rule. This government is known as Big Brother. In order for Big Brother to stay in power, a few things are necessary: identity cannot exist; everything and everyone must be uniform; the past must be controlled in order to regulate the present; and the people must constantly be practicing the ideas of Newspeak and Doublethink, a form of control the government holds over the people. By enforcing these simple laws and regulations, the government is able to keep a tight grip on its people, with few ever releasing themselves from its grasp. Winston Smith on the other hand, seeks to know the truth behind the government, he is constantly questioning everything and repressing all the ideas forced upon him. Winston “seeks truth and sanity, his only resources being the long denied and repressed processes of selfhood” (Feder 398). All identity is gone in this place called Oceania, and for the sake of Big Brother and its continuous control of the people, it will never exist again. In 1984, the absence of identity strips the people of all creativity and diversity, as well as takes away any chance the society has to advance as a people or in the area of technology.
“Invisible Man” by Ralph Ellison has several themes embedded within it. These themes range from race to women and femininity but they all conglomerate to form one major theme. This theme is identity and the truth of identity. Through “Invisible Man”, Ralph Ellison suggests that the concept of identity is both an internal and external conflict. Through the story of the nameless narrator we see that self-perception and public perception of any individual is an everlasting conflict.
“We are #Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget #ExpectUs #MillionMaskMarch #OpVendetta #UK”. That message is from the many tweets off of Twitter that the group Anonymous. That message has been one of their many slogans. In Anonymous’ case how do you have an all-encompassing slogan when you have no structure or hierarchy? When you are just a loosely aligned group of internet users how do you become an international group that is an example of an alienated counter-culture Anonymous is many things. Lots of different people have their opinions on them. One thing for sure is that they use Twitter to voice their alienation. The alienation I believe is the strongest is the feeling and belief that they are a counter-culture. They think they are exposing the corruption of the majority and the societal system. Anonymous thinks they are the moral opposite of that corruption. However, the group has many battles to fight. There are many who mock the group. To find research on the group, you have to go to nontraditional media sources often including their home website 4chan. The alienation felt by Anonymous is that of a counter-culture. First however, you must learn what is Anonymous is, how they started, and what they did. That may answer where they will go next.
...oss, but specifically in cases where the protagonists are unaware or do not desire loss of individual identity and cases where the protagonists purposefully choose to conceal individual identity by using disguises. In the progression of both stories, the former is seen less often while the latter becomes more common as both characters gradually become more aware of the differences between their individual identities and the collective identities of their surroundings along with greater authorial portrayal of the rigidity of society through necessary conformation to one collective identity. Throughout the two works, the two authors extend the concept of home beyond the conventional portrayal as merely a physical structure by giving it significance as a state where the uniqueness of individual identity can be freely expressed.
‘The Stranger’ is a philosophical concept introduced by Simmel. The term can be applied to everyone because he believes that anyone can become ‘the stranger.’ ‘The stranger’ is an “element” of the group and we need it to help define ourselves, because constantly we try to distinguish ourselves from others. Coming from a Jewish background, Simmel surely would understand what it means to be a stranger. “A trace of strangeness…easily enters even the most intimate relationships” (Simmel, 1908, p.147). Simmel argues that this “strangeness” exists in all relationships even among closest friends and families. It also exists within our own identity because he believed that it is necessary to be different from the group. The qualities of being near and far demonstrated by ‘the stranger’ mean that he is not strongly part of the social group allowing him to look at things objectively without being bias. “Objectivity can also be defined as freedom,” (Simmel, 1908, p.146) in the case of ‘the stranger,’ means that he is outside the limits of social constraints and is not defined by the society. By being “the freer man” this allows the individual to become ‘the
Humanity is defined by one major factor: one’s understating of the self. By understanding one’s self, one can understand society and the world that surrounds themselves. There is one thing that can often distort one’s personality, one’s identity. By identifying as one thing a person can often change how they act or do certain things. This is often found to hide one’s true motives or intention, but it can also be used to hide hidden factors that aren’t as prevalent. One’s personality and identity are very closely linked, and tend to play off one another. This fact can be show in within multiple works. To name a few authors who demonstrate this fact: Clifford Geertz, Horace Miner, and Andrei Toom. Their works seek to dive deeper
We listened as Mrs. DeCostia enumerated the names of those involved. “Kat, Tara, Kelly, Alexis, Rob, Joe, Matt, and John.” She announced with annoyance. How is it that all my friends got in trouble for the greatest prank in Fairfield’s 75 year history, but my name was left off that prestigious list? I watched my friend’s proud faces as they walked to the front of the room and I laughed as I heard Matt say “So you caught the people, who perfectly reconstructed your room on the roof of the school, but you will never know who the genius behind it was, and as long as that stays a secret, we’ve done our job.” Then Mrs. DeCostia grabbed him by the shirt collar and dragged him outside. Soon there was a wave of people standing and clapping for their hero, the only person to show Mrs. DeCostia what a horrible person she really was. Apparently since my name had been left off the list, they had no intention of revealing it. But still I got the greatest prize of all, even better than being called up there with them: knowing that it was my idea to take every item out of her room and put it on the roof. There was a loud slamming of the door and soon the classroom fell silent. “Whose idea was it?” shouted Mrs. DeCostia. She was answered by silence. “I’ll ask one more time: Whose idea was it?” She said, speaking ever so slowly to ensure he understood. This time she was answered by a deep voice that could only be recognized as John’s. “You’re never gonna know so you might as well give up now.” “Oh, I will find out and when I do that person will be expelled! Now who is it?” Then in a voice that always seemed to say “What are you looking at?” Kat said “Listen lady, I don’t know who you think your dealing with but you’re never gonna know. We’re like...