Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society and women's roles
Society and women's roles
Principles of virtue ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society and women's roles
We have all been in situations where we just could not conquer! This situation here not only has a financial issue but they are stuck in a costly situation. Heinz and his wife are in special need of a medical cure they cannot afford. Heinz himself has tried to find every resource available to help his wife but none has worked out in his favor. He has tried everything he could, and asked everyone whom he thought could help him; the druggist himself still is not letting up with the price he has given Mr. Heinz. With the druggist being the only dependable source right now, you would think he would want to help this cancer patient and save her life but that is not the case. The druggists feel as though since he created the cure, and paid for the …show more content…
Developed mainly by feminist writers, such as Annette Baier, this account of virtue ethics is motivated by the thought that men think in masculine terms such as justice and autonomy, whereas woman think in feminine terms such as caring. These theorists call for a change in how we view morality and the virtues, shifting towards virtues exemplified by women, such as taking care of others, patience, the ability to nurture, self-sacrifice, etc. These virtues have been marginalized because society has not adequately valued the contributions of women. Writings in this area do not always explicitly make a connection with virtue ethics. There is much in their discussions, however, of specific virtues and their relation to social practices and moral education, etc., which is central to virtue …show more content…
Now let us just say that it was the husband on his deathbed, and his wife was the one out there trying to come up with these four thousand dollars. What exactly do you think she could have done differently to get the money? What exactly would this male doctor have made her do, to receive this cure for her husband? If she was the one out there begging and barrowing, do you think she would have, came up with more than two thousand dollars? Do you think if she was the breaking in and stealing, do you think they would have shown her some sort of sympathy? All of these actions falls right back into the ethics of care which also supports the virtue of
For anyone who has ever worked in healthcare, or simply for someone who has watched a popular hit television show such as Grey’s Anatomy, General Hospital, House or ER know that there can be times when a doctor or health care provider is placed in extremely difficult situations. Often times, those situations are something that we watch from the sidelines and hope for the best in the patient’s interest. However, what happens when you place yourself inside the doctors, nurses, or any other of the medical provider’s shoes? What if you were placed in charge of a patient who had an ethically challenging situation? What you would you do then? That is precisely what Lisa Belkin accomplishes in her book “First Do No Harm”. Belkin takes the reader on
Quill took two morals decision, to help Diane to commit suicide and lie about the diagnosis of Dianna cause of death. Under the Ethics of cares Dr. Quill did not do what he support to do in Diana situation. Care is a practice of doing an activity consistently over time. A practice need to incorporate standards to evaluate it. Under the ethics of care, helping patients to commit suicide was not constantly being part of his job. Moreover, if we take into consideration doctor standards to evaluate this situation it will not be permitted under doctor’s ethics rules to help patient to take away life. In other words, Dr. Quill actions to lie about the diagnosis of the cause of death is a crime. At that time, helping to suicide was illegal and it was paid with jail. In the ethics of cares, justice is a value and who ever do something wrong under this ethics need to pay for that. In other words, he did not took the best decision to lie about the diagnoses of death and may have to pay with
The case of Marguerite M presents an ethical dilemma. Medical ethics play a special role in medicine and is directly concerned with its practice. Its role has continued to evolve as changes develop in
The ethical principle of nonmaleficence demands to first do no harm and in this case protect the patient from harm since she cannot protect. Nurses must be aware in situations such as this, that they are expected to advocate for patients in a right and reasonable way. The dilemma with nonmaleficence is that Mrs. Boswell has no chance of recovery because of her increasing debilitating mental incapability and the obvious harm that outweighs the intended benefits. If the decision were to continue treatment, suffering of the patient and family would be evident. Autonomy is the right to making own decisions and freedom to choose a plan of action. When making decisions regarding treatment of another person, it is important to respect the expressed wishes of the individual. John says that his mother would want to live as long as she could, but questions arise related to her quality of life and perception of prolonged suffering by prolonging the dying process. In BOOK states that quality of life changes throughout one’s life ...
Braddock, Clarence, and Mark Tonelli. "Physician Aid-in-Dying: Ethical Topic in Medicine." Ethics in Medicine. University of Washington, 2009. Web. 3 March 2015.
...t’s family should be able decide for the patient whether or not prolonging their life is moral.
In the last half of the nineteenth century, Victorian ideals still held sway in American society, at least among members of the middle and upper classes. Thus the cult of True Womanhood was still promoted which preached four cardinal virtues for women: piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity. Women were considered far more religious than men and, therefore, they had to be pure in heart, mind, and, of course, body, not engaging in sex until marriage, and even then not finding any pleasure in it. They were also supposed to be passive responders to men's decisions, actions, and needs. The true woman's place was her home; "females were uniquely suited to raise children, care for the needs of their menfolk, and devote their lives to creating a nurturing home environment." (Norton, 108). However, the tensions between old and new, traditional and untraditional, were great during the last years of nineteenth century and there was a debate among male and female writers and social thinkers as to what the role of women should be. Among the female writers who devoted their work to defying their views about the woman's place in society were Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Kate Chopin.
In outlining the difference between feminist and nonfeminist approaches to ethics, Walker contrasts the "expressive-collaborative model" (1998, 60) of most feminist ethics with the theoretical-juridical model of most nonfeminist ethics. She argues that the reigning non-feminist moral theories, such as ...
In critical and complicating medical cases, family members often find it tedious to decide as to what mode or procedure of treatment is idyllic for the recovery of their patient. In such cases, well-qualified and medically educated can play a pivotal role in deciding the kind of treatment that should be given to the patient to enhance its recovery. In a contrary situation a nurse may know that administering a particular drug may improve the patient’s condition, but may be refrained from conducting the required action due to doctor’s absence or non-permission. There are numerous cases through which ethical dilemmas in the profession of nursing can be discussed. Nurses in order to remain within the defined boundaries ...
Gedge, E., & Waluchow, W. (2012). Readings in health care ethics (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario: Broadview Press.
Contemporary feminists have a big problem with traditional ethical theories because of their basis that women can never be fully moral. Traditional ethical theories suggest that an excess of emotion indicates a deficiency of reason. This could not be farther from the truth for lack of emotion is not a requirement for rational reasoning. Traditional ethical theories do not accept the morality of reasoning. For example, the Kantian categorical imperative asks us to reject reason and be completely impartial while calculating morality. In conclusion contemporary feminists have made much progress in transforming the gender hierarchy of traditional ethical theories a...
...eport that Jane had previously engaged in drug use. The drug use may ultimately affect the life of the baby. It seems implausible to suggest that the medical staff is doing what is best for the fetus when there is no way of knowing the quality of life the baby will have. While I understand that some ethicists may argue that it is the duty of healthcare professionals to do everything they can to sustain life, I feel that it is important to consider the quality of that life. I agree that while the quality of life unknown, it seems to make more sense to take the chance rather than just let the fetus die, but it is not my choice. Being that I find autonomy to be the governing principle, it is up to Jane to decide. Therefore, in case #2, the medical staff should respect Jane and her choice delivery the baby naturally whether or not they believe it to be the best choice.
Introducing the feminine voice means to draw attention to women’s special strengths, and to correct the systematic devaluation by our male-dominated society. In the book of In a Different Voice, with the intention to help women, identify more positively with their own distinctive style of reasoning about ethics, instead of feeling that there is something wrong with them because they do not think like men (unlike Kohlberg’s and Freud’s theories). One group of feminists (Noddings, Baier) tried to articulate further the feminine voice in moral reasoning. Others (McMillan, Rich, Ruddick, Harstock) agree that women have distinct virtues, and argue that these need not be self-victimizing.
Pearsall, Marilyn, ed. Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy. Third Edition. Toronto: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.
... be forgiven for doing what I feel is the only option. I do not think that I would be able to live with myself if my loved one died just because I was afraid of what others would think of me or of losing my freedom. I feel like the druggist is being selfish in this situation and should think about all of the lives that he can save. Even though the druggist probably endured many expenses with the creation of the radium, hopefully he created it first to save lives and then maybe to make a good living from it. I think it is always good to put yourself in someone else’s situation before you make decisions. After all, I firmly believe that what comes around goes around. Stealing the medicine may cause jail time, loss of money for the doctor and possibly being judged by others that do not agree with your decision does not weigh as heavy as trying to save a life.