Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A personal view against animal testing
Should animal testing be allowed
Animal rights testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A personal view against animal testing
Animal research is a very hot topic for many people. There are two sides to this argument, with both having strong opinions. One side is strongly against researching and testing done on animals, and the other side is strongly for testing and experimentation on animals.
The side that is considered “pro” animal testing has many statistics to back up their argument. Such as the fact that 95% of animal testing is done on mice and rats. The majority of which are bred specifically for lab testing. Many people say there is no adequate replacement for testing on a living, whole body system, and that animals are very similar to humans, so they are the best choice for testing things to make sure that humans do not get hurt. Before testing on animals,
…show more content…
The saying that animal research is cruel and inhumane is common on this side of the argument. This is backed up by experiments that were conducted that consisted of the animals being force fed, food and water deprivation, physical restraint, burns and other wounds, pain, and killing them using many different methods. They also use the argument that animals are way different from humans, and therefore do not accurately represent what can happen to humans if they use the products that were tested. The sleeping pill called thalidomide, created in the 1950s was tested on animals prior to being released to the public. This pill caused severe deformations in over 10,000 human babies. Out of all the animals being tested on, 95% are not covered or protected by the Animal Welfare Act. The AWA is a law that controls the treatment of animals in research. This act does not cover rats, birds, fish, and mice. These animals also happen to be the most commonly used in animal-based research. This act effectively protected 1,134,693 animals in 2010, which left around 25 million animals who are not covered by the AWA vulnerable to abuse and mistreatment during animal
Is animal testing really worth taking away animal’s valuable lives? No, I think it’s wrong, inhumane, and cruel. Animals have feelings like humans do and they should be treated with respect even though they are just animals.When animals are tested over time they live in cruel and harsh conditions. They are tied up and changed to their cages or devices they are being tested on. Almost all tests fail in humans and it is not worth sacrificing an animals life.Think about all the things animals have to go through all the harsh and cruel treatment.They are put in conditions where they are not allowed to eat or drink and move around. Is it really worth killing an animals for eyeliner that will never hit the market or for drugs that all fail in humans. So here are some of the reasons I think we should ban all animal testing.
The first pro to animal testing is that it has helped us create lifesaving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association released a statement saying almost every single medical breakthrough has resulted in the direct use of animals in the last 100 years. Can you believe this? Taking out dogs pancreases helped us discover insulin, chimpanzees helped us get a vaccine for Hepatitis B, and even the polio vaccine was tested on animals. Animal testing has also helped us treat and understand conditions like brain injury, breast cancer, cystic fibrosis, childhood leukemia, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, malaria, and many others. It even helped us develop anesthetics, pacemakers, and cardiac value substitutes. Almost every cure for any condition is due to animal testing. Without animal testing, we may not have been able to find many of these cures and find cures for other conditions in the future.
Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.
There are several types of animals being used for research, but not surviving the test. Animals are similar to human beings; they have hearts just like human beings. Researchers have absolutely no sympathy for these animals, including the vicious ones. All animals need some type of affection from humans, or else there is a high possibility the animals will not survive. Personally, animal researching should be banned, but doing so, the researchers would have to find something else or someone else to test the products on to make sure the products are useable to humans.
Animal testing has been a highly debated topic in recent years. There are many people who have finally started to speak their minds and tell how they feel about testing on animals. But just as there are those who oppose animal testing, there are those who fully support it. A majority of people who do not support animal testing provide valid facts and information for why it is not needed. Some of the facts that they provide revolve around the conditions that the animals have to endure in the testing labs. The Animal Welfare Act lays out rules about how animals are allowed to be tortured, beaten, maimed, and all sorts of other things as long as they get pain relief. Those who oppose animal testing also provide facts that show how unreliable the
Animals have been tested on for a lengthy amount of time, according to American Medical Association, AMA, on page 620 “Animals have been used in experiments for at least 2,000 years.” A large extent of knowledge has been gained from animal research but there is still a great deal of opposition to animal testing. However, the benefits of animal research greatly outweigh the penalties of animal research. Therefore, animal testing must be used if humans are to continue their search for knowledge. Without the sacrifice of a few animals many others would die, animals are used for many advantageous things, if not animals than what are scientists supposed perform experiments on, and there are several valid counterarguments for animal testing.
Did you know medicine you take is tested on animals before they are used on you? Well if you didn’t then animals from all over the world has suffered and died because of medical testing. These animals are suffering pain the medical testers has been testing medicines on the animals to make sure they are safe for humans they have been using toxics on animals to see if there is any more ways of making it safe. Thousands of animals population are being decreased due to animal testing. People from all over the world is not realizing that what they use that is medicine or cosmetics are safe for them because of animals everyone is safe because of animals it has been finding cures for types of illness because of animals because they have been suffering the pain for you. Animal testing should be illegal animals lives are suffering with pain and are dying the population is decreasing.
Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality, there are more cons than pros in animal testing.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
The positive outcomes of animal experimentation are far greater than the possible destruction of an animal’s life because a human’s life could be saved. Animals that are used for testing do not have a specific purpose in life that could outweigh the effects their life could make if used for research. There is the argument though concerning the effects of using them animals and how it affects the food chain. Some animals and rodents may not seem to have a specific purpose in life but are a part of the food chain. This is something that needs to be look at and if there is no detrimental effect on the food chain then using them for research would not affect the environment. For many years, animals have been treated very differently than humans do; therefore, this makes animals very susceptible subjects. If animals did have the rights humans did, then hunting would be outlawed and everyone would become vegetarians. Animals have generously been given acts and laws to prevent any harm to be done, such as the Cruelty to Animals Act in 1876. There have been benefits from using animals for research, such as finding cures and treatments. Many research associations have said that nearly every medical breakthrough has resulted directly from animal research. Chimpanzees, which are used in most cases, share 99% of their DNA with humans (ProCon.org, pg 2). We share 98% of our
Animals have held an important spot in many of our lives. Some people look at animals as companions and others see them as a means of experimental research and medical advancement. With the interest to gain knowledge, physicians have dissected animals. The ethics of animal testing have always been questioned because humans do not want to think of animals on the same level as humans. Incapable of our thinking and unable to speak, animals do not deserve to be tested on by products and be conducted in experiments for our scientific improvement. Experimentation on animals is cruel, unfair, and does not have enough beneficial results to consider it essential.
Animal testing hasn’t been beneficiary towards any scientific breakthrough or discovery. Elias Zourhini says, “Animal testing has been useless” he is one of the main people who are strongly making a push to try and stop animal testing as a whole. “There have been thousands of dead and injured animals in the past years or so and there has been any reward or safety ensured because of these animals. Animals have been being used for testing for many years now, and especially now, the number of animals that are being used to be experimented on are extremely high. However, you may not know that laboratories aren’t required to publish how many animals they used or how many experiments conducted. Maybe that would help to find out especially what animals need to be strongly protected against testing. “Every laboratory should publish an annual statement setting forth plainly the number and kind of experiments and the methods of conducting them” (Gould qd. in Leffingwell 211). This would help many things and especially organizations that are protesting, to give reasons and facts about testing. Animals are used and then unaccounted for. Truly, you may never know h...
For many years there has been controversy whether or not animals should be tested on between scientists and animal right supporters. It is very debatable if animals should be tested on when a cure for a disease could be found from testing on animals. From my own personal view I have a huge heart for animals, but if we can not find other alternatives, and is possible we can find cures for diseases, then animals may be used for research, but only for medical reasons.
Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.