Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Although many pro-test members claim that animal experimentation is a necessary proceeding, these practices should be removed from the research process. The statistics from numerous researches and investigations have revealed what many are refusing to see, that the outcome of these experiments is vague and indefinite. Cosmetic companies and health institutions kill millions of animals each year. Animal testing is imprecise, expensive, unethical, unnecessary and ancient science that should be punished severely.

In one hand animal experimentation costs thousands of dollars to institutions. When animals are brought from kennels or zoos into laboratories, certain standards must be met. Cages, retainers, and materials to build environments

The type of information they claim to obtain will be nearly impossible without a living object. Although other methods have been developed, scientists will use an animal on some stage of the experiment, to keep it as safe for the humans as they could. Without the animals being tested on, the chances the first human takes are greater, the risk of complications increases to a high percentage. Including as well the profit margin they are prompt to make, a drug tested on an animal, and supposedly safer will be more likely to be accepted, and the public will spend more money on this drugs or cosmetics for the reason that it might seem safer in their heads. Bottom of the discussion is, if they do not test drugs or cosmetics on a rat, people will not spend money on it, and the company will loose

It is hard enough for them to keep their experiments going with all the hate and the prohibitions they have to talk openly about the topic, and now accusations about them not knowing what they are talking about come along too. Animals are alive just like humans are; therefore they are more similar than a computer program. They describe Animal Right Movement activist fools. They argue that even if they tried, the alternative developed in the industry would never work on the testing of certain conditions like strokes or ischemia. They could stop testing on animal subjects and use computer programed mechanisms, but instead of doing any good to any of the sides, it will stop the research for cures or slow it down tremendously, and then all of the animals already use will be for nothing, that will represent a real waste of lives, not what they are performing