Analyzing The Movie 'The Interview'

1195 Words3 Pages

The movie “The Interview” starring James Franco and Seth Rogen, directed by Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen himself, is about a late-night talk show host named Dave Skylark (Franco) and his best friend and producer Aaron Rapport (Rogen) who run a nationwide popular TV show “Skylark Tonight.” When they gain information that the biggest dictator of the 21st century, Kim Jong-un, is a super fan of the show, they book and land a personal live interview with him in hopes to be viewed as real journalist and no longer as jokes. As Skylark and Rapport prepare for their trip to Pyongyang, they are approached by the CIA and are recruited, the two most under-qualified men possible, for a highly-classified mission of assassinating the North Korean dictator …show more content…

In this film, once introduced, he is quickly seen as a misunderstood man who has the personality of an average person, attempting to be liked by those close to him. This portrayal of the dictator is an attempt to play it safe in the political world while still posing as controversial by showing that the man is a psychopath who in general needs to be killed, which is done in at the end of the film with great over exaggerative flare. In the movie he is just really another average guy whose only difference is he is in control of the most hated country in the world and has the power to cause World War 3. He is a man who worries that his weakness for margaritas and Katy Perry’s “Fireworks” are gay, as said his father. The song “Fireworks” and fiction of “The Lord of the Rings” are the film’s most apparent pop-cultural reference points showing that just about anywhere you go, something from America’s main stream culture will be loved by those all around the globe. Kim Jung-un’s weakness’s, including his love for Dave Skylark, are absurd and add to the simple humor and criticism, feeding the radical ideas, of who Kim Jun-un might be as a person . In the film Dave Skylark is used as Kim’s tragic flaw as his vulnerability towards him ends up being the reason he is killed. The over humanizing of this characterized ruthless leader …show more content…

It’s typical objectification of woman, sexual innuendos, stereotypical portrayal of men being idiotic and emotionally confused, can be distasteful to most but I personally found it humorous and enjoyable. I’m not saying that I advocate for any of the actions or references made, as more of that the way it was portrayed and presented made the absurdity impossible to ignore and hard not to like. It was another ludicrous film added to the Rogen and Franco collection, but was a movie that I would not mind watching again when bored and looking for a good laugh. If I had to give it a general rating it would be a solid 6.5 maybe 7 out of ten. Definitely not a prime choice for family night but for those days with nothing to do and a laptop in front of you… why

Open Document