Analyzing Dr. Martin Luther King's I Ve Been To The Mountaintop

1002 Words3 Pages

Analysis of King’s “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his speech “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” on April 3, 1968, on the Mason Temple Church in Memphis, Tennessee, where the city’s sanitation workers were striking. King’s speech to 15,000 people, was written to try and motivate the African American community to keep fighting for the rights that they deserve. In King’s speech he talks about how everyone needs to “stand with a greater determination”. He also addresses the point that they need to be helping the sanitation workers who are on strike. King helps gives examples to motivate his audience with things such as when Bull Connor sent dogs and used hoses to try and stop the King and hundreds others from a …show more content…

He helps strengthen his message by using pathos to appeal emotion to his audience. He tells his audience about when Bull Connor would send dogs to attack the nonviolent protesters and spray them with high power which was “set at a level that would peel bark off a tree or separate bricks from mortar” (Gilmore). But because those people were so determined to fight for the rights that are endowed to them, that they “ain’t gonna let nobody turn me around.” King also uses pathos when he talks about he “had been stabbed by this demented woman.” Furthermore, that the doctor said if he “had merely sneezed” he would have died. This helps appeals to the audience’s emotion because Dr. King was stabbed for who he was, but he was still up there speaking to everyone fighting for what he believes in. Finally, King uses pathos when he asks the question “what would happen to me from some of our sick white …show more content…

King does this to emphasize that they need to get through these challenges so that they might be able to get the rights that they are entitled to. King also uses parallelism when he says to his audience a story from the bible. It was about how a man at the side of a rode seemed to be in need of assistance because of robbers that had been on that same rode. A priest and Levite passed him without helping, then a Good Samaritan walked by and helped the man. The priest and the Levite ask the question “if I stop to help the man, what will happen to me?” On the other hand, the Good Samaritan asks, “if I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?” King used parallelism to apply the same questions asked by both the pastor and the Levite, and the Good Samaritan, in whether they should help the sanitation workers. By using parallelism between the two situations King is able to emphasize that the right thing to do is help the sanitation workers because if they do not, “what will happen to them?” Finally, towards the end of King’s speech he talks how he had almost died from a stab wound and he could have nearly died if he had sneezed. King uses parallelism by beginning six different sentences with “if I had sneezed, I wouldn’t have” and following that he would say one of an important event that King had done after his near acquaintance with death. His use of parallelism here

Open Document