Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July

750 Words2 Pages

Civil disobedience is defined as the act of refusing to obey laws, pay taxes using a nonviolent means of protesting or of attempting to achieve political goals (“Civil Disobedience”). Thoreau shows the act of civil disobedience in Civil Disobedience. Douglass also demonstrates civil disobedience in “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”. There are also many famous figures that practiced civil disobedience. Harriet Tubman was also a well- known civil rights activist that helped many slaves escape through the Underground Railroad. Rosa Parks displayed civil disobedience when she refused to give up her seat to a white passenger, creating the Montgomery boycott intending to end segregation. Many of these civil rights activists have influenced the way things are today. Civil disobedience has forever affected our society in many ways. Civil disobedience is appropriate and justified under certain circumstances. In Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, the act of civil disobedience is displayed when he does not feel the proper reason to pay the taxes. Although another man does pay the taxes, he does not think it is necessary. Thoreau states, “I declined to pay. But, …show more content…

Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, Douglass’s “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks portrayed cases in which civil disobedience is justified. These people go against the law is some way to do what they believe is right. They risk the chance of being punished for, not only themselves, but others too. Without these acts of civil disobedience, others would not feel that it is okay to speak up for their beliefs. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (Tag). Do not be afraid to stand up for what it right and against what is unjustified. It is a big responsibility to go against the law but in the end, it could very much be worth

Open Document