Analysis Of J. Mackie's The Subjectivity Of Values

1123 Words3 Pages

J. Mackie in his essay, “The Subjectivity of Values”, geared his audience towards the idea that not all people’s moral values are necessarily the same. Not every person has the same value for certain circumstances, objects or other things which moral values can be applied to. Mackie explains moral values somewhat like this; that they are not necessarily based on behavior alone but that behavior can have some affect within certain values. Not all people that act similar necessarily will have the same values. I see Mackie trying to explain his view as many similar people have similar interests, but at the same time there is always those people who are similar by action but different by mentality and ethics. That is where Mackie drew the difference between the idea people were getting that he was solely basing his ideas off …show more content…

In the end I see Mackie saying that there are no morally good people, however that is only because there is no such thing as morally good or bad people. Mackie’s argument from queerness comes in two set points. The first point being the metaphysical argument, is that objective values would be radically different from anything in our experience; “if there were objective values, then they would be entities or qualities or relations of a very strange sort, utterly different from anything else in the universe. ” And the second point is stated as an epistemological argument, is that there would be no way to know these queer things without a special, non-empirical means of knowing them (intuition). Through this argument it seems as though Mackie is telling us that objective moral facts should create urge in ourselves to do whatever it is we are urged to do, yet morality cannot make us do anything itself and therefore leads to Mackie to seem to conclude with the idea that there are indeed no such thing as moral

Show More
Related

  • A Comparison of Values in The Rich Brother by Tobias Wolff

    657 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Tobias Wolff’s 1985 short story “The Rich Brother,” we are introduced to two brothers. According to Wolf, you cannot even tell that they are brothers because of their physical differences, but as the story goes into more detail we can tell that they are different in every aspect. One of the major differences is that one is wealthy and the other is always in need of financial assistance. The older brother, Pete, is a successful real estate agent while his younger brother, Donald, works as a painter whenever he can. The two brothers are very different in their belief about what is valuable. Pete is a man that has worked hard and values what he has acquired. His brother Donald, on the other hand, values sharing whatever he has. Even if giving everything he has leaves him with nothing.

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiment: The Relationship Between Obedience And Authority

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ogien defines “character broadly speaking, [as] a certain way of acting or feeling that is consistent, that is, stable over time and unvarying from one situation to the next” (Ogien 123). For Aristotle, “virtue, is a state of character concerned with choice, lying in a mean…relative to us, this being determined by…that principle by which the man of practical wisdom would determine…and acquired by repetition” (Aristotle 124, 129). Mark Timmons, a moral philosopher, also makes a slight distinction between character and virtue by defining virtue as “(1) a relatively fixed trait of character (2) typically involving dispositions to think, feel, and act in certain ways in certain circumstance, and (3) is a primary basis for judging the overall moral goodness or worth of persons” (Timmons 212). Additionally, bioethicists Tom Beauchamp and James Childress define virtue in terms of “a trait of character that is socially valuable and a moral virtue [as] a trait of character that is morally valuable” (Beauchamp 31). My reason for going through the ways in which different philosophers have defined virtue is to (1) show that Ogien critiques virtue ethics without correctly representing the term virtue in the theory or defining virtue at all and (2) to show that among moral philosophers (at least read for this week) there is commonality in defining virtue in some way or another as a fixed character. (3) Just because a person possesses a certain character trait that does not mean that that person is virtuous and (4) in regard to the Milgram experiments, there is no way to determine the virtuous character of the subjects involved based solely on this one experiment alone. Virtuous character requires consistency of a particular character trait. Virtue is not a one-time act or an act on occasion. From the point-of-view of virtue ethics, we can only “take as a sign of states of character the pleasure or

    Read More

  • Christopher Mccaandless Analysis Essay

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Journalist Jon Krakauer reassembles the fact of life of a young man who leaves his family and society to find true himself. Krakauer intends to reveal Christopher McCandless’s character and nature by interacting people who influenced him. The more people were attached to him, get to know more about him in depth; those who know him from outside often refered him as careless. In the book Into the Wild Krakauer presents McCandless as modest and caring person whereas other may see him as thoughtless.

    Read More

  • Values In John Ludwig Mackie's Inventing Right And Wrong

    749 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Mackie, objective values are considered as primary qualities, which are independent. Objective values are queer because they are not connected to the natural world. Thus, they do not exist in the world. Nevertheless, McDowell argues that values are actually secondary qualities. Specifically, secondary qualities are connected to observers, and depend on observers’ perceptual sensations, while primary qualities such as shapes can be described without any perceiving agent. Although objective values cannot be described by some sort of entities or qualities, they can be perceived by suitably sensitive observers in suitable conditions. Hence, objective values do exist when there are perceivers of these values. Again, take cruelty as an example. Mackie claims that cruelty and wrongness are not connected. However, McDowell would say that since people perceive cruelty, through their sensitive perceptions, they interpret cruelty as wrong. Perceivers act as an interpreting agent, thus giving objectivity to moral

    Read More

  • J.L. Mackie's Evil and Omnipotence

    1664 Words  | 4 Pages

    A second and stronger objection to Mackie’s version of the problem of evil is explained to us using the terms 1st and 2nd order goods and evils. 1st order goods/evils are purely physical. Examples are pleasure and pain, happiness and misery. It is claimed by many theists that 1st order evils such as pain and suffering are necessary for 2nd order goods like courage and charity. However there exists what Mackie calls a “fatal objection” to this claim and that is that along with 2nd order goods there must also exist 2nd order evil...

    Read More

  • John Ludwig Mackie And Moral Objectivity

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality is not something that should be easy to comprehend, and philosophers such as Mackie and McDowell are taking the wrong approach when trying to describe morality in natural terms. People need to understand that morality is something supernatural that we don’t have the capacity to comprehend. However, this does not mean that all moral judgments are false. There is a right choice in every scenario, however the variety of scenarios in this world is so grand that one cannot judge it by one code of

    Read More

  • Mackie's Theory Of Ethical Objectivism

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    Everyone has some kind of doubt about morality. When we make a moral judgement, we believe this has to have some objective background to make it true, and Mackie argues that this is false. Basically, when we are making a claim we are in error, which is why his theory is called the “error theory”. (Class notes, pg.16)Mackie believes that there are two important arguments to prove to you that there is no such thing as ethical objectivism. It is very common for us to base our decisions on our values and what we believe is right or wrong.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Being Earnest Analysis

    1578 Words  | 4 Pages

    “I’ve now realized for the first time in my life, the vital importance of being Earnest. (713.521-523) Jack’s final line demonstrates his understanding of the secret meaning behind “The Importance of Being Earnest”, by Oscar Wilde. That human beings have the capacity to be both good and evil. This is shown through the character of Jack, other character’s relation to Jack, and even in the theatrical elements of the show.

    Read More

  • Lord of the Flies: The Beast Within Us All

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all bad. People are more complicated than you think, and one has to be more knowledgeable about the complexities.." Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all... N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Jan. 2014. .

    Read More

  • Simple Subjectivism and Serial Killers

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Subjectivism in simplest terms is the belief that moral judgments are simply individual expressions of feeling. Subjectivists believe that there are no objective moral truths; they believe that moral truths are only statements that represent how the proponent feels on a particular issue. Therefore, a subjectivist would focus more on Price’s intentions of com...

    Read More

  • Rethinking Education: Alternatives to College

    1320 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “7 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Go to College and 4 Things To Do Instead”, Michael Price explains why students shouldn’t go to college and what they can do instead. Michael Price writes for the Huffington Post and is an entrepreneur, author, and master marketer. This article was published June 17, 2014. Price introduces the article by talking about his personal experience during his first day of college as a freshman. Price had been studying business outside of college, and found that his professors terminology of business was “flat out incorrect and in some cases totally outdated” (Price). He was angry that he was paying to be taught incorrect information. Price then goes on to introduce the seven reasons why people should avoid going to college. These reasons consist of how college

    Read More

  • A Defense Of Homosexuality By John Corvino

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    He believes that a lot of thing that people value in life, such as clothing and medicine, “are unnatural in some sense” (211). Yet, no one suggests those being immoral. On the other hand, disease and death, for example, “are ‘natural’ in the sense that they occur ‘in nature’” (211). So being unusual isn’t enough to be called as immoral. The arguements of abnormal, offensive or disguesting do not make things “unnatural” either because there are activities such as eating snails or cleaning toilets that disguest people but aren’t listed as immoral. Moreover, arguements such as animal practice and moral innation do not label homoseuality unnatural because after all, what is normal can't in any way, shape or form be characterized. By the end of this section, he concluded that “homosexuality is either perfectly natural or, if unnatural, is not unnatural in a way that makes it immoral”

    Read More

  • Joan Didion's On Morality

    677 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin, “On Morality'; is an essay of a woman who travels to Death Valley on an assignment arranged by The American Scholar. “I have been trying to think, because The American Scholar asked me to, in some abstract way about ‘morality,’ a word I distrust more every day….'; Her task is to generate a piece of work on morality, with which she succeeds notably. She is placed in an area where morality and stories run rampant. Several reports are about; each carried by a beer toting chitchat. More importantly, the region that she is in gains her mind; it allows her to see issues of morality as a certain mindset. The idea she provides says, as human beings, we cannot distinguish “what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil’';. Morality has been so distorted by television and press that the definition within the human conscience is lost. This being the case, the only way to distinguish between good or bad is: all actions are sound as long as they do not hurt another person or persons. This is similar to a widely known essay called “Utilitarianism'; [Morality and the Good Life] by J.S. Mills with which he quotes “… actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.';

    Read More

  • Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex? An Essay by John Corvino

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order for Corvino to make his position that gay sex is not morally “unnatural”, he must first respond to several arguments. Many natural law theorists believe that sexual organs should only be used for three distinct purposes; reproduction, making a home for children through marriage, and emotional bonds. However, Corvino responds to this by arguing many of the human organs can be used for different functions, therefore we cannot make an argument defending only sexual organs. In his work he refers to this principle of what can be considered natural and unnatural when stating, “If the unnaturalness charge is to be more than empty rhetorical flourish, those who levy it must specify what they mean” (Corvino 84). He uses this statement to support his claim that gay sex is morally natural by proving that society often claims many “unnaturally” processed goods as being natural. If this is the case then we cannot define a human function as “unnatural” with any moral justification.

    Read More

  • Good vs. Evil in William Golding´s Lord of the Flies

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    It seems as though there is so much more evil than good in the world today. We hear of war and fighting 24/7 but we rarely hear about the good things that happen. Everyone is born with both good and bad within them. We, as humans, must choose which one we want to be. In The Lord of the Flies, Ralph is good while Jack is evil. Ralph represents the good side of us while Jack represents the evil side. Although sometimes it is easier to be evil, it pays off to be good. The novel is a perfect example of how all people are born with both sides. At the beginning, the boys choose the good side, with morals and civilization. But as the story moves on, the boys find it more exciting to be on the bad side. It shows that all the boys are torn between good and bad and there is a very thin line that separates both. We realize that people are born inherently good and bad because in life there are always right and wrong choices, children are born good but are easily influenced to do bad, and it is always harder to do what is right than what is wrong.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of J. Mackie's The Subjectivity Of Values

Open Document