Analysis Of The Guide By Naipaul

976 Words2 Pages

From this story one is reminded of the scenes in The Guide by R.K.Narayan where the protagonist becomes popular mendicant by chance. It can also be alluded to stories of fake pundits in Naipaul’s early works like ‘The Mystic Masseur’, where Ganesh, the sincere school teacher, degenerates into a fake pundit whose lucky cure of a paranoiac enables him to practice sham politics. Willie’s father, a sincere follower of Gandhiji’s principles becomes a fake mendicant to protect himself from the threat of his customs, parents, the principal and the fire brand uncle of his wife. Willie was born to a low caste woman and high caste man, in an undefined place in pre-determined India and sets out on a journey of life. The ridiculousness of the significance ordinary men attach to their own lives is another topic dear to Naipaul, and that forms the second part of the story. In the Mission School when the teacher asked a question, “what does your father do?’ he felt ashamed and irritated. From that day Willie began to despise his father. The more successful he …show more content…

He longs to go away from that place. He slips one day on the front steps of Ana’s estate house and becomes unconscious. He wakes up later to find himself in the military hospital in the town among wounded black soldiers with shining faces and tired red eyes. When Ana comes to see him in the hospital, Willie tells her hat he is going to leave her: ‘I have given you eighteen years, I can’t give you anymore. I can’t live your life anymore; I want to live my own’ (Naipaul 136). When Ana proposes that they should go to Portugal, Willie replies: “Even if they let me in there, it would be still your life. I have been hiding for too long.” (Naipaul 227). And Ana’s assertion, ‘Perhaps it wasn’t really my life either suggests that even those who seem to be living their own lives don’t really have more of a personal life than ‘half a

Open Document