Analysis Of Terrence Rattigan's The Winslow Boy

836 Words2 Pages

In his play, The Winslow Boy, Terrence Rattigan explores the formidability of the patriarchy in London in the early 1900s by following Catherine Winslow’s relationships with Sir Rogers, John Watherstone, and Desmond Curry. Through Catherine’s internal conflict, “Rattigan is careful to trace the play of male proprietorial gazes through which women have to pass.” Branded a “New Woman” for her commitment to women’s rights, Catherine faces adversity when seeking a role outside the home (9). Regardless of her strong-willed attitude, Catherine still feels pressure to adhere to the social norm of marriage. When her will to get married conflicts with her desire to pursue her intellectual passions like political advocacy, Catherine resolves to exercise …show more content…

Initially, Catherine fully anticipates marrying John, begging her father not to let her down and “forbid the match” (8). However, as the scene continues Catherine’s attitudes do not match the expected emotions of an engaged woman. Her mother criticizes, “You’re such a funny girl…You don’t behave as if you were in love,” showing that society has standards for women in love (9). Catherine, choosing to satisfy her mother, declares, “I love John in every way that a woman can love a man, and far, far more than he loves me” (9). Realizing his sister’s intellect and the superiority complex of patriarchy Dickie warns, “Suppress your opinions. Men don’t like ‘em in their lady friends, even if they agree with ‘em. And if they don’t – it’s fatal. Pretend to be half-witted…then he’ll adore you” (32). At this point in the play, Catherine still feels the looming patriarchal power and prioritizes her relationship with John. Placating Dickie, she assures him that in a battle between her heart and mind, “there’s not much doubt about which will win”

Open Document