Analysis Of Scott Russell Sander's The Men We Carry In Our Minds

1522 Words4 Pages

Two texts set in the mid-1900’s that discuss and examine the significance of class position, power and privilege is Scott Russell Sander’s text “The Men We Carry in Our Minds” and John Berger’s text “The Suit and The Photograph”. Both texts explore social class and that one’s social class greatly affects the way one is perceived and the course of their life and opportunities offered. Within the texts, they both highlight the gap between lower and upper-class residents. While both of these texts consist of a very similar central purpose and both attempt to persuade the reader about the existence of class in their time, both writers use very difference strategies to convey their thesis. Although both Sanders and Beger’s texts consist of strengths …show more content…

Without either of these, a reader can come to the conclusion the argument has no real significant or real reliability. Berger references important writers/critics in his text, such as Walter Benjamn, Goethe and Doblin at the start of the text. However, his main evidence that he refers to and uses primarily throughout the text is the photos of men in suits. He states villagers and workers were persuaded to choose and buy suits by publicity, pictures, mass media, and salesmen. (39) As well as this, he uses the image of the villagers in suits to show that he believes class difference is evident. He continues to say it is easy to determine lower class and upper class by the appearance of the suits, lower class not looking as nice. While he includes the date of the images and source, the use of the photos could be criticized, as he is using images to argue such strong claims. Berger states in a photograph shown in his text that the social class is evident when the lower class musicians are wearing suits. He uses some emotive language and uses negative adjectives to describe them as looking “uncoordinated, bandy-legged, barrel-chested, low-arsed, twisted or scalene”. This could be faulty reasoning as Berger’s has made a direct statement claiming the musicians look like all these negative things, giving the reader the question of can this be accurately be determined from the photos, or is Berger’s opinion and bias, as the photos are of low quality and may not necessarily look ‘bad’ to other people. If a reader does not find Berger’s evidence convincing or generalizing, they may not be able to be persuaded by Berger’s argument and disregard it. For instance, Donald Hall has said: “If we cannot support our generalization, we must abandon it, or at least we must admit the worthlessness of limited examples as proof of anything” (313). Unlike Berger in this example Sanders has

Open Document