Analysis Of No Boundaries By Ken Wilber

501 Words2 Pages

What is time? The book, No Boundaries by Ken Wilber has an entire chapter dedicated to how time is an illusion, just one of the many boundaries humanity has cooked up and fallen for as truth. It continues to argues that we exist in an eternal present. The question remains however, is it, right? That is something to witch I am still in doubt.
“For eternity is not an awareness of everlasting time, but an awareness which is itself totally without time. The eternal moment is a timeless moment, a moment which knows neither past nor future, before nor after, yesterday nor tomorrow, birth nor death”. (Pg. 56) In this statement Wilber defines his view of eternity, not all of time but a single moment that lasts forever. He later gives some examples, “Lost in a sunset; transfixed by the play of moonlight on a crystal dark pond which possesses no bottom; floated out of self and time in the enraptured embrace of a loved one; caught and held still-bound by the crack of thunder echoing through mists of rain. Who has not touched the timeless?” (Pg.57) The problem I have with this idea and these examples that while they may feel timeless, they are still susceptible to time, the sun must go down, the day must begin, If time were merely an illusion, then it would not have a physical effect, everything would remain still. …show more content…

For the mystic claims that all of our problems are problems of time and problems in time.” (Pg. 58) He will go on even further to say that these problems don’t exist in the present time, “No such animal as a present problem exists”. The problem with this is that while pain exists in the past, so does pleasure, and as he states earlier you can’t have one without the other. Likewise, using this logic it is impossible not have present problems, if you break your leg, it is hard to see how that is not a present

Open Document