Ideas And Actions Of Slavery In Machiavelli's Chapter Summary

884 Words2 Pages

In chapter 13, Machiavelli speaks of how a prince should try and refrain from using auxiliary forces in order to invade or defend a land. He reasons that since they are not the prince’s forces, that the fight whether won or lost leaves him with an unfavorable scenario. By winning the war/fight or whatever it may be, he is still in debt to the one who is the true ruler of the forces. If the prince loses the fight, then he would be captured or left without any defenses. Machiavelli goes further in detail to mention various historical events that ended up going awry because of reliance on auxiliary forces. One of his examples is from the Old Testament, to be exact it is the tale of David and the Goliath. Also, he criticizes the actions of King Louis the Eleventh for having ruined much of his …show more content…

I personally see how this could go wrong for both the protesters and the police officers, but I have no problem with the officers being there protecting a city from potential harm. The part that I do have some trouble wrapping my head around is the use of the National Guard to defend the cities surrounding Ferguson if there were/are riots. On one hand, I see how it is just an added precaution. On the other hand, I see it as an overstepping of the Governors boundaries. If I were protesting in these cities, I would be scared for my life. Having an assault rifle pointed at you by someone who may not understand that you’re protesting peacefully is a scary idea let alone actually having it done towards you. Theoretically, the police should be able to control any type of civil unrest that may occur because of how heavily armed all police forces are today. By Governor Nixon allowing the National Guard to be present, he has come under fire by various rights groups and media stations. Whether or not it was actually a bad decision will be decided in weeks/months to

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Tom Weylin And Rufers's 'Slavery'

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    Slavery, when most people hear this word they cringe. Some people say slavery dates back to as far as 8000 BC.But what exactly is slavery? According to Merriam Webster slavery is defined has, “Drudgery, Toil, Submission to a dominating influence” (Slavery). But lets define it a little more, the first word we see is Drudgery which means “ dull, irksome, and fatiguing work : uninspiring or menial labor” (Drudgery). In Kindred Dana remarks that “Slavery is a long slow process of dulling.” (Kindred 183) which you can see to be true from the fact that dull comes from the very definition of slavery. Slaveholders would use many different forms of dulling the slaves in order to make them obedient and submissive to their owners.Throughout the story both Tom Weylin and Rufes use different ways to dull the slaves into to knowing their place on the plantation, sometimes it works, but

    Read More

  • The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli strongly believes that a prince should be involved in the military and understand all military matters. A prince must always be concentrated on war. Whether his country is at war or not, he must always be prepared. He must continuously be training, mentally and physically, and know the terrain around him. Machiavelli believes that a prince who does not attain these military related qualities will fail as a leader. In addition, during times of war, a successful prince should always question all outcomes of possible battles and prepare himself for the future by studying past wars. Studying the

    Read More

  • Why Did Machiavelli's Use Of Cavalry

    4021 Words  | 9 Pages

    Machiavelli also asserts the financial and logistic advantages of infantry. Due to the extensive upkeep of horses and equipment, cavalry drains a state’s treasury more

    Read More

  • Slavery in Frederick Douglass Text

    343 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Frederick Douglass text is an excellent and personal account of slavery. It was compelling to read and follow the different changes in his life throughout his time as a slave with different masters. The text significantly articulated the experiences that made Douglass the man that he was. In looking at his life and the way that he expressed this trough writing provided a unique view of the harmful effects of this cruel bondage on whites as well as blacks. It was apparent that Douglass had a purpose, which he served extremely well, in writing his life story. The insight that was gained from reading it was so overwhelming that one can see why it made such an impact upon its original circulation. I was touched in reading the text, as it is a history that very much interests me. The tribulations that Douglass endured and witnessed were so real that in reading them one can almost imagine seeing the images that were described. In his graphic detail and description Dogulass succeeds in maintaining not only an interest but also a concern, sincere emotion that cannot be denied upon experiencing his words. The explanations for certain occurrences by the slaves were helpful and also an aid in evoking emotion. I felt pity and anger as Douglass provided examples of the way that slaves would argue and even fight about whom had the best or smartest master. In writing his autobiography he not only allowed raeders to explore his trial as a slave but also provided an undersating the system itself pertaining to its operation and evaluation thereof. An example of this is the description of what was looked down upon by both slaves as well as whites such as not giving a slave enough to eat. The reading was very interesting but heart-wrenching, though sympathy was not a goal for the fervent author.

    Read More

  • Slavery In Pseudolus, By Titus Maccius Plautus

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Marvin Perry, “ slaves was practiced in ancient times, in many lands, and among most people.”(Perry, 112) Especially in ancient Roman, when Roman armies expand to other countries and areas successfully, they captured people during the battle and send back to Rome to be sold to the wealthy Romans as their slaves. During the last centuries of Republic and the early centuries of the imperial age, the Roman war brought back to a huge amount of slaves as their spoils of the wars. Slaves was considered legally to be a piece of property without their own freedom. In ancient Roman, people called their slaves as the “Speaking Tools” . Slaves did not treat as a human beings with legal citizen rights. They sold as products to the market and valued by their demographic characteristics including age, gender, personal skills, ethnic,manner, appearance, and personality. The lives of slaves conspicuously harsh by their tough works and cruel tortures from their inconsidered masters. The more brutal oppression of masters, the more intense of slave revolt, and finally to cause the massive revolt in Roman.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Machiavelli's Moral Life

    1773 Words  | 4 Pages

    Politics could not exist without the concept of morality. As Walzer states, “moral life is a social phenomenon, and it is constituted at least in part by rules, the knowing of which (and perhaps the making of which) we share with our fellows” (Dirty Hands, page 170). The same definition could be used to define a law, and one could argue that a law is just a political moral. Political life is also a social phenomenon, constituted by rules, which are acknowledged and created by our peers. Laws are political extensions of our morals, the commonly agreed upon virtues by which we live our lives. As the human race, we have universally agreed upon morals we expected to abide by. As a politician is an extension, not an exception from, the state, the

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Machiavelli's The Prince

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Machiavelli’s novel, we encounter several specific instances in which the author gives explicit advice to would be or currently serving princes and rulers of nations. Much of this advice can be easily translated to world leaders in the present day, including the President of the United States. However, some of the advice that Machiavelli gives out are things that often times don’t apply to current world leaders. As I explore the novel, I can’t help but imagine several real life politicians using some of the methods of ruling discussed by Machiavelli, with the true of definition of Machiavellianism being “the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct.”

    Read More

  • Machiavelli vs. Lao-Tzu

    284 Words  | 1 Pages

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    Machiavelli includes numerous references to ancient and modern examples of ruling peoples’ behaviors in his treatise. However, he does not simply state factual evidence to support his own claims; Machiavelli turns simplistic historical stories into examples of fine military tactic. Take, for instance, Chapter 8, in which Machiavelli gives his rendition of Agathocles’ coming to power. He states, “At every stage of his career, this man… behaved like a criminal; none the less he accompanied his crimes with so much audacity and physical courage that when he joined the militia he rose through the ranks to become praetor of Syracuse” (Ch. 8, p. 2). Notice, Machiavelli only included two real facts here: Agathocles joined the militia, and became praetor of Syracuse.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the television series, House of Cards, a position in Congress is the basis of the show and the main character, Frank Underwood, thrives for his goals of personal achievement and working his devious plans into a profit for himself and ultimately achieving anything he wants no matter what it takes. Frank Underwood is an extremely intelligent congressman, who lives in Washington D.C. representing his home state of South Carolina, but has always put his self first. At the introduction of the show he states, “I see two different types of pain, useful pain, that helps you grow, and useless pain that does nothing but cause suffering”. These sorts of pain, but more importantly the meanings, explain a specific part of his distinctive morals that carry his actions along and show how he works with certain people or conflicts. His eminent colleagues of the U.S. legislative branch, specifically congress, perception of Frank is that he does whatever he can to make the government stronger while his intellectual perception is the contrary. While his colleagues trust him, it is hard for Frank Underwood to show a virtuous personality, enough to have full faith and trust especially regarding a huge decision he makes to murder a member of the Legislative branch. This internal situation, mirrors the philosophy (shown in the book, “The Prince”) of the political Philosopher, Niccolo Machiavelli, who has provided many with the conflicting opinion of modern times political contemplation. The scene in the last few minutes of “House of Cards: Chapter 11” exemplifies Frank’s means for consequentialism by, the fact of achieving his ultimate maxim or intended end. There is no skepticism that Frank’s actions do not follow solitarily consequentialism but ther...

    Read More

  • Ledership Comparsion between Machiavelli and Gilgamesh

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    For all of Machiavelli’s ruthlessness and espousal of deceit, he knew the value of authenticity and relying on his administration. A true leader cannot achieve greatness alone. Machiavelli says that the prince is the state, and the state is the prince. This means that whatever vision and principles the leader holds in the highest regard, they must be known to the state so that they can be realized. He believed that no matter how a prince was elected, his success would depend largely on his ministers. Collaboration between a prince and ministers would create an atmosphere of harmony and camaraderie, highly reducing the chances of rebellion. Without the support and cooperation of the people, military action is not possible, expansion is not possible and most importantly, governance is not possible. If a leader does not satisfy the needs of the people, they have the power to overthrow him through strength in numbers. Thus, a leader depends just as much on the people as they do on him. A leader must be able to convince the people to buy into his visio...

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince and The Discourses

    2286 Words  | 5 Pages

    Niccolò Machiavelli thoroughly discusses the importance of religion in the formation and maintenance of political authority in his famous works, The Prince and The Discourses. In his writing on religion, he states that religion is beneficiary in the formation of political authority and political leaders must support and endorse religion in order to maintain power. However, Machiavelli also critiques corrupt religious institutions that become involved in politics and in turn, cause corruption in the citizenry and divisions among the state. In the following essay, I will examine Machiavelli’s analysis of religion and discuss the relationship between religion and politics in Machiavelli’s thought.

    Read More

  • A Slave In Form By Frederick Douglass Analysis

    890 Words  | 2 Pages

    A “slave in form” refers to Douglass’ legal status of being a slave. A “slave in fact” refers to the lack of pride and self-determination he possesses as a human being. This dichotomy develops throughout the novel. At first, Douglass is not only physically shackled by slavery but emotionally limited because of this self-identity. As the novel progresses, Douglass goes through a striking transformation: over time, he begins to see himself as a free-standing human being, despite remaining a” slave in form.” Although there is an obvious turning point, this happened over time. Douglass displayed true freedom of thought at a young age when, despite his master’s protests, he decided he wanted to learn to read. Later, reading leads to understanding and allows him to help the abolitionist cause. By exercising the individuality necessary to go against one’s master’s wishes, Douglass inadvertently began the long journey towards true autonomy.

    Read More

  • Slavery By Another Name Essay

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The film “Slavery by another name" is a one and a half hour documentary produced by Catherine Allan and directed by Sam Pollard, and it was first showcased by Sundance Film Festival in 2012. The film is based on Douglas Blackmonbook Slavery by Another Name, and the plot of the film revolves around the history and life of African Americans after Emancipation Proclamation; which was effected by President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, for the purpose of ending slavery of African Americans in the U.S. The film reveals very brutal stories of how slavery of African Americans persisted in through forced labor and cruelty; especially in the American south which continued until the beginning of World War II. The film brings to light one of my upbringing

    Read More

  • Reaction to Machiavelli's The Prince

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli argues in chapter 5 that the key to taking over a free state is initially to destroy it. By destroying the city, Machiavelli believes that the citizens will have no choice but to follow the direction of the new prince. He goes deeper to say that if a prince who occupies these cities does not destroy it, he risk the probable outcome of a rebellion. This rebellion is brought fourth by the tradition held by the citizens and the memories of the former way of government. The second step is to live there in person to establish loyalty and the third step is letting the people live by its own laws, but establish a small government who is loyal to you to keep it friendly. Chapter 6 gives us some insight on what Machiavelli feels leadership is. Leaders, he explains, are followers too in many ways. All leaders are imitating great rulers in history. A leader who really wants to achieve glory, does so by his own prowess, meaning by his own talent. Anyone can inherit a kingdom, but not anyone can rule it with natural leadership. This kind of leadership is what makes great leaders in history such as Moses or Cyrus. Chapter 7 explains that a leader should not try to buy his subjects. If a prince buys his subjects they will only temporarily be loyal. A prince needs to eliminate his enemies and do so all at once. Even if a prince does not succeed in ruling by his own prowess in his lifetime, he is still setting a good foundation for future princes which is just as important. Chapter 8 explains the level of evil that should be done in order to rise to power. He gives us clear insight of the pros and cons of obtaining power by evil means and how to use evil in ways of benefit. Machiavelli was a man of manipulation.

    Read More

More about Ideas And Actions Of Slavery In Machiavelli's Chapter Summary

Open Document