Analysis Of John Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education

348 Words1 Page

Locke considers the basis of knowledge to be the acquiring of ideas, rather than an innate understanding of a topic. He states that knowledge can only be learned either through physical sensation or by the mind “reflecting on its own operations within itself” (6). In Some Thoughts Concerning Education, Locke also explains an effective manner of learning, describing that his own ideas are “not the product of some superficial thoughts, or much reading; but the effect of experience and observation” (9). A teacher, according to Locke, can take a student so far, but “no body ever went far in knowledge, or became eminent in any of the sciences, by the discipline and constraint of a master” (10). Essentially, the majority of a student’s learning occurs outside the classroom, as long as it is a topic the student feels motivated to pursue beyond school. That being said, Locke also points out that “our education fits us rather for the university than the world” (11). Taking all of this into consideration, Locke seems to believe the purpose of education is to teach students about topics they …show more content…

Locke explains, “Attention and repetition help much to the fixing any ideas in the memory. But those which naturally at first make the deepest and most lasting impressions, are those which are accompanied with pleasure or pain” (8). The majority of classrooms use the former method, so their assistance to students is lessened. The idea that students learn best through sensory or reflective experience is why, as Locke demonstrates, education can be ineffective in teaching students. I agree that much of what a student learns will never be applied, and yet there are some things, such as learning how to read, that students can more effectively be taught through a teacher rather than through

Open Document