Analysis Of Human Nature In Irene Gut Opdyke's 'In My Hands'

1597 Words4 Pages

Human nature can be essentially good or bad. World War II, an international disaster, created conflicting ideas about humanity. German Nazi dictator, Adolf Hitler, was the source of tragedy for many Jews and other innocent lives during this time. The infamous Hitler was the leader of one of the world’s most horrific genocide, the Holocaust. Through Holocaust, many “criminals” were imprisoned, tortured, and killed from concentration camps, death camps, and murder. These “criminals” were mostly Jews, Polish, gypsies, disabled, and other minorities. The novel, In My Hands, by Irene Gut Opdyke and Jennifer Armstrong, voices Opdyke’s story during World War II. Irene’s experiences of protecting Jews show both sides of human nature, good and bad. …show more content…

Milgram wanted to put it to the test and see if the Germans were just following orders from authority figures. For his experiment, he had three roles: the learner, the teacher, and the researcher. The learner, who was an actor, was taken into a room and had electrodes attached to his arm while the teacher and the researcher were in another room that had an electric shock generator and switches that ranged from slight shocks to dangerous and deadly shocks. The teacher had to test the learner’s spelling of a list of words. Every time the learner made a mistake, the teacher is told to administer an electric shock, increasing by fifteen volts each time a question is answered incorrectly. The learner, purposely gave many wrong answers and many teachers administered a shock, but some refused to administer a shock. When the teacher refused, the researcher gave the teacher’s orders to continue the test and ignore the suffering learner. The learner demonstrates that people are obedient towards authority figures. These authority figures are the ones that are …show more content…

In Opdyke and Armstrong’s novel, In My Hands, Irene, Jaina, Helen, and Helen’s mother go to a nearby work camp to look for Helen’s husband. While they are outside, the four of them witnessed “an officer make a flinging movement with his arm, and something rose into the sky like a fat bird. With his other hand he aimed his pistol, and the bird plummeted to the ground beside its screaming mother, and the officer shot the mother too. But it was not a bird. It was not a bird. It was not a bird,” (Document A). The author chooses to use the word, “flinging” when the officer is about to shoot the baby. This indicates that the action of killing an innocent baby is very casual. For this reason, it is possible to assume that leaders believe that genocide is necessary and casual. People in power are transformed during war. Even an officer, who has slight power over citizens casually strolls through the streets and murders “criminals”, because he has authority to abuse his power and neglect basic human rights.In fact, one of the human nature studies, the Stanford Prison Experiment is an example of abuses of power. Psychologist, Philip Zimbardo wanted to investigate how people would conform to the roles of prisoner and guard. The guards were allowed to do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain order, except physical violence was not permitted. The purpose of this experiment was to study

Open Document