Analysis Of Guns, Germs, And Steel By Jared Diamond

723 Words2 Pages

In the book Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies the author Jared Diamond covers a vast array of historical and geographic events. Diamond compares and describes many developments that are occurring in different geographic areas around the world. What was his purpose for writing and comparing this vast amount of information? What did he want the reader to get out of it? His purpose for writing this text is to explain why certain cultures developed faster and what circumstances left the others at a disadvantage. The overall goal of the book is to explain how certain cultures became dominate and succeeded and how others didn’t develop as much. Diamonds summarization of the book gives you an insight to the meaning the book has. …show more content…

He relied heavily on many different types of evidence. He used scientific evidence, historical evidence, and even back ground knowledge from many different fields of science. One of the major downsides to this book is that Diamond did not quote his sources in the text and did not let you know where the evidence or facts he is stating is coming from. At the back of the book he does have a further readings section that I assume he read and drew knowledge from. Also there is a credits page at the end of the book that show where he got the photos that were used I the book. Other than that he does not really give you too much information on where he gets all these facts and information from. Diamond did use a variety of charts, graphs, and pictures. Most of the different charts and graphs defiantly help understand the material better and give you a visual to what’s going on in the text. On the contrary some of the graphs and charts seemed out of place and made it feel like he was trying too hard to stuff information in wherever he could. They were defiantly confusing at times as I did not see the connection between the text and charts in a few occasions. Other than the charts and graphs that were poorly placed a lot of the material help reiterate the points Diamond was trying to make. Furthermore, Diamonds writing style is very unique he adds plenty of anecdotes to add to what he is saying. Also I like the fact that he used old and modern examples, this really help people connect to what he is saying. I don’t like how he stuffs too much information in each paragraph. It adds to the confusion and doesn’t give you a clear picture at what he is trying to get at. Diamond is really passionate about this subject, it doesn’t seem at all like he wrote this just because he had too. I think this is a subject he pondered on for a long time and carefully placed in together. Diamond used

Open Document