Analysis Of Blowing Up On The Spot And Virgo

1355 Words3 Pages

Whether or not we know it, we as people are very picky, and opinionative. In everyday life as humans, we pick and choose things based on preferred criteria. Based on the features of the world around us we have become biased on the things, that do, and do not meet our criteria. Being the opinionative people we are, we set criterion for even the literature we read. Just as the world around us, books have unique characteristics that we either enjoy or could care less for. In the following paragraphs I will evaluate the stories “Blowing up on the spot” and “Virgo” and will compare them to what I feel they need. I will provide my own set of criteria for the short stories “Blowing up on the spot” and “Virgo” stating my likes and dislikes for the two stories and explain why I felt …show more content…

The main characters were not described at all and some sub characters were defined as “a fat coyote” (Walter 58) the ex-boyfriend and also his father as being a “big sloppy man” (Walter 59). Mentioning a coffee house and how the narrator first met Tanya here “in a coffee shop where I saw her reading her horoscope” (Walter 60), and I feel that the smell, or the layout of the coffee house would help me get into the story more. Where was she in the coffee shop compared to the narrator? What was the smell in the air when he saw her for the first time? The fathers home and the girlfriend’s apartment were also not explained. I felt like I was outside of the story listening in and not given any details on what the rooms could be visualized as. Even the description of the newspaper could have been better portrayed to help me visualize the setting for half of the story. In the end I felt like I was robbed of a better story full of “descriptions that prompt the reader to visualize characters in their setting” (Cassill 1706). Since this story did not describe its characters or the setting it did not meet my requirements for vivid

Open Document