Analysis Of Augusto Boal's 'Theatre Of The Oppressed'

817 Words2 Pages

In the Augusto Boal reading, I learned about his Theatre of the Oppressed and how he developed and constantly evolved his methods. The Theatre of the Oppressed was where Boal took his techniques and used them to promote social and political change. “Spectactors” was the term used to describe his active audience.
Boal once said, “Everyone can do theatre: even actors!” This sentence created problems because it implied that actor training was not necessary. However, he combatted this later by saying, “While some make theatre […] we are all theatre” (306). It is also important to mention that Boal believed everyone has the ability and the right to act in the sense that acting referred to acting, socially and politically. I found his recollection of writing plays for him and his siblings as a child fascinating because this is something …show more content…

Lecoq stressed that the external elements would shape the internal feelings. Laban was primarily a dance teacher, but his methods brought tremendous value to acting; he wanted his students to overcome habit and develop a creative body. Grotowski took an alternate path called via negative or “Road backwards” and said that the movement was not as important as the impulses that create the movement. Chekhov placed emphasis on the actor’s body as a source of inspiration. All of these people used physical movement in their approaches to acting and theatre. While they each have different qualities that they brought into the physical action side of theatre, I believe they each are equally important in how movement in theatre has gotten to where it is today. I think the most important point of this article is that “theatre is nothing if not endless, eternally protean,” or tending to change frequently. Theatre is everchanging and the evolution of movement is one way to show the progression in one aspect of theatre over

Open Document