Analysis Of An Animal's Place By Michael Pollan

880 Words2 Pages

No one will disagree that livestock industry in America has its flaws in the processes in which we treat animals before they are slaughtered. The industry is littered with inhumane practices still being used on livestock. The overcrowding of cattle and trimming the beaks off of chickens to prevent them from harming each other are common practice in the factory based livestock farming. I’m not here to argue that these practices are morally correct, only that they are a necessary evil. I’m arguing that converting all of the livestock industry in the United States from factory meat farming to free range farming techniques would have a significant negative impact on the United States economy as well as the wellbeing of the American citizen. …show more content…

He describes the factories as “places where the subtleties of moral philosophy and animal cognition mean less than nothing”(405). His arguments about the morals of the ways we should treat animals, provokes the feelings of guilt and empathy for the reader, which makes his essay a strong argumentative piece of literature. Pollan makes strong points, backed of with evidence, regarding the minds of animals and their ability to feel pain and suffering on not only a physical level, but on an emotional level. The major weakness of his argument is that it mainly deals with the moral dilemma of mistreatment of animals with in factory slaughterhouse and for the most part ignores the economic consequences of free range livestock. Big company slaughterhouses don’t just immorally treat animals for the fun of it but rather as a way to meet the high level demand of the American people while keep prices low enough for them to …show more content…

The middle class individual will be to change his habits to adapt to the changing environment due to his flexible income. But what happens to the lower class or even the individuals who fall below the poverty line. They can no longer afford the high prices of meat that are accompanied with the change in the way animals are treated. I know what your thinking, why don’t they just buy more vegetables and fruits instead of meat? Well if we apply the supply and demand theory to the impact of this moralistic change the answer will be evident. Let's say the prices of meat rises and people decided to switch their dietary habits and buy more fruits and vegetables. As the demand for fruits and vegetables increases the the supply will begin to decrease as more people purchase them. In response to the supply decrease business will be forced to increase the prices to ensure they stay profitable. So now the lower class Americans are no longer able to afford food like they used to and are now forced to go hungry or make sacrifices in other areas of their lives. So the real moralistic question is, whose life is more important the chicken who lives for a few months and is slaughtered or the impoverished child whose parents can no longer can afford to feed

Open Document