Analysis: Andres Serrano

1643 Words4 Pages

Ren Robinson
Contemporary Art
Dr. McClintock
April 2015
Andres Serrano Curatorial Essay
Contemporary art is about questioning what you have been taught and what you know to be true or real. This is why Serrano’s work is a pivotal moment in photographic and art history. Andres Serrano is an artist that is not afraid to tap into the universal truths in life to illicit reactions. He focuses on religion, sexuality, gender, and race- all of which can define a person’s identity. Serrano then makes his viewer question these pre-conceived concepts of identity and their function in society with his art. He attempts to figure out what is accepted, and more than that, what is the taboo. Andres Serrano is an artist that has continued to push the boundaries …show more content…

And almost every biblical reference discusses the uncleanliness of semen, and the process one must take to cleanse yourself or your clothes after ejaculation. “When a man has an emission of semen, he must bathe his whole body with water, and he will be unclean till evening.” Untitled XIV stands in direct contrast to the biblical references. There is not the slightest hint of filth, uncleanliness, or depravity. There is nothing shameful. There is nothing sexual. There are no distractions, Serrano created a very clean composition with the photo of his ejaculate. It is simply…there. The Bible treats semen and the act of ejaculation as if its something shameful, something that must be tolerated, cleansed and forgiven; while Serrano’s In Trajectory series takes ejaculate and illustrates it in such away as to be more proud, a testament more so for the intrinsic beauty in the essence of masculinity.
Semen can turn into life just as easily as it can be a mess for someone to clean up; it is potentiality is constantly teetering on the edge. The use of semen is just another way to bring a true, raw, physical element to …show more content…

Serrano embraces this theory, but also criticizes it with his Morgue series. Serrano attempts to separate the corpse from their past identity. With his stylistic choices, the “portraits” present death and the way we think of death in a new light. Serrano, though, is not striving to portray the “life in death,” but rather tackling a new way for us to see death and life. Unlike post-mortem photography of the 19th and early 20th century, Serrano strives to keep the anonymity of the subject, stripping their identity. He leaves nothing distinguishable except for the titles that include the causes of death. These titles allow the viewer to pass judgment on the corpse. Serrano wants to express the unfairness and intrinsic bias in constructing opinions on the dead based off information like, Knifed to Death I and II information that many might associate with criminal activities. These corpses are not seen as individuals but as allegories. The black ink on the fingers in Knifed to Death I and II are another more literal example of the process of attaching criminal identity to the corpses, leading a viewer to come to the conclusion that “the dead are posthumously subject to a variety of identity categories different from what they may have chosen in life.” These corpses are being categorized and judged in death as they might have been in

Open Document