Understanding Poverty: Reflections from 'What Matters'

1039 Words3 Pages

Dan Parris, a filmmaker and owner of Speak up Productions, in his documentary, What Matters, argues that it is everyone’s responsibility to care for the poor. Parris along with his two friends and assistant producers, Rob Lehr and David Peterka embark on a journey to experience poverty firsthand, in order to challenge their audience to think about their purpose. They adopt a deeply personal tone as they call young people to action. They support their claim through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos. Dan Parris did not only want to make a documentary showing the hardships of poverty, he wanted to personally experience it for himself. Ethos was clearly displayed when all three men accepted the challenge of living on no more than a dollar and …show more content…

However, Parris also used pathos in his documentary by discussing the fear associated with developing nations, and poverty stricken communities. While visiting Belgrade, they met with one of Parris’s friends, Veda, and asked her to take them to see the Gypsies. Veda refused at first, saying that she was afraid of them because she did not “think [she could] help them enough for them to be nice to [her]” (What Matters). This same fear that Veda had is a wide spread cause for most people’s inaction. Jared White from Operation Invisible Children said that “everyone talks about the problems; no one likes to talk about the hope”, enforcing the idea that people are too afraid to go into these places; instead they write it off as hopeless (What Matters). After receiving a strong warning from a pastor prior to leaving for Africa, Parris summarizes the problem with fear saying “that’s why no one ever goes to Africa, that’s why nothing ever happens, because there is so much fear” (What …show more content…

Farooq Tirmizi argues that “the foremost problem with foreign aid is that is creates dependency” (Tirmizi). Many are concerned that countries becoming dependent on the aid, therefore becoming stuck in a repeating cycle of poverty. He argues that by providing free food and other resources we take away the possible business from that country, giving them a crutch “instead of helping the country stand on its own two feet” (Tirmizi). Tirmizi makes a bold statement saying that aid “provides only temporary solutions to chronic problems while deepening the structural flaws that caused them in the first place” (Tirmizi). Parris contradicts this belief by making his audience aware that money and food is not the only type of aid that can be sent. In the documentary it mentions that “money is great but talent is great” too (What Matters). Parris argues that everyone has a talent that can be used to help these people build themselves

Open Document