Amy Wilkins Three Subcultures

2169 Words5 Pages

Fighting for Justice or Just for Attention? The Many Ways Being Different Isn't Social Change The problem with structuring subcultures in the context of resistance is that sometimes it’s really hard to figure out just what someone is resisting. The CCCS approach focuses on subcultures of the Working Class because its much easier to see their actions in terms of resisting larger social structures. In Amy Wilkin’s (2008) book she depicts three subcultures primarily consisting of middle class white youth. While there is still the possibility of resistance, the efforts of goths and Unity Christians are aimed achieving distinction, while the wannabe desires authenticity. Instead of wanting to change the actual hierarchy, they simply want to rig the game so that they can win. Often these ‘deviant’ actions serve to reinforce existing structure. Goths, Christians, and Puerto Rican Wannabes use the idea of the ‘other’ to form their own identities, often by using less privileged groups to define their own distinction. The use of sex is common among all three as a way of lending biological weight to what would otherwise be viewed as a ‘phase’. In a way, Wilkins’ subcultures are actually the opposite of resistant. As Thornton notes, “distinctions are never just assertions of equal difference; they usually entail some claim to authority and presume the inferiority of others” (Thornton 1995, p 201). However, Wilkins’ notes a number of contradictions and places of resistance in her …show more content…

The problem for her studying it is that “the goths and the Christians talked little about race. The wannabes talked little about gender. And almost nobody talked about class” (Wilkins, p. 3). However, just because we don’t speak about these things does not mean that they are not effecting our actions, rather Wilkins looks to see what lines were being drawn by what wasn’t being said as well as what

Open Document