Amanda Knox Case Analysis

979 Words2 Pages

The Documentary of Amanda Knox

The story of Amanda Knox is one that is well known by almost everyone around the world. In 2007 this young girl from the US was studying abroad in Italy when her whole world changed in the worst way. Her british roommate, Meredith Kercher, was viciously murdered in the house where they were living. This murder case made international news and was diversely controversial. The case and prosecution of Amanda Knox was most likely due to her gender, and was very different from the way we prosecute in the United States according to our laws and regulations. In my opinion, Amanda Knox was falsely accused and prosecuted and it was very well to do with the media attention this case brought along with it. The prosecution …show more content…

When searching for DNA evidence they contaminated the crime scene in many ways. Some did not wear protective gear when inside the home where the murder occurred, possibly transferring DNA evidence into parts of the crime scene that was not originally there, and others examining the crime scene did not change gloves or booties when going from room to room, which could possibly transfer DNA as well. In the lab, they examined many pieces of evidence together, which could also transfer of DNA, and would immediately get evidence thrown out in US court. Also, when using DNA you have to be very precise and accurate. These people were not. They used DNA that was almost unidentifiable and unrecognizable as evidence. This would never happen in US court, and if it did the evidence would be thrown out almost immediately. Now, I am not saying that the US judicial system is perfect, but they are definitely more stick than that of Italy, and if things were the same in Italy I believe that Amanda Knox would have never been convicted of …show more content…

The media and her gender overdramatized the murder to make it look as if she was the murderer. This murder making international news caused the police to try and find a murderer very fast, which also caused several mistakes to have been made. Her confession was obviously coerced, and she still did even confess to the murder, and the DNA evidence used should have never been used in the first place. This documentary did a very good job in stating the facts, but it was also biased in the sense that it was based on Amanda Knox and her story. Seeing her cry and tell the story as she viewed it definitely made the audience, including me, feel for her and her innocence. Overall, the documentary was very well done and informative, influencing me to believe in the innocence of Amanda

Open Document