Alamo Vs Goliad Massacre Essay

Do you know the difference between the Battle of the Alamo and the Goliad Massacre? Do you know the outcomes of both of them? Do you know who was involved? well both the Battle of the Alamo and the Goliad Massacre have a lot of information on all of this. You get to know the reasons for the battles, the outcomes, and even the tactics. First, The Battle of the Alamo is a stronghold built by Spanish missionaries. It occurred in February of 1836. Santa Anna attacked and 189 Texans fought back. On March 6th, 1836 all rebels were killed. Also, 1500 casualties from Mexican Troops, and 30 civilians sparred. The outcome was following a 13-day siege, Mexican troops under President General Antonio López de Santa Anna launched an assault on the Alamo

The Goliad Massacre claimed the lives of nearly 350 captured soldiers but rallied support for Texas independence. The outcome was The Goliad massacre, set in the town of Goliad on March 27, 1836, was the killing of Republic of Texas soldier-prisoners and their commander, James Fannin, during the Texas Revolution by the Mexican Army under orders from General and President of Mexico Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. Lastly, The Battle of the Alamo and the Goliad Massacre are different in many ways, one of the ways they are different is that the Battle of the Alamo is basically a safe haven and the Goliad Massacre was a battle and not safe. There were also Prisoners found by General Jose Urrea and Santa Anna that were executed into piles and burned. Several attacks by Urrea resulted each time in the Mexicans being repulsed by the deadly fire of the Texans. By dusk, the Texans had loat about sixty men killed or wounded against some 200 of the Mexicans. In conclusion, There are many things to compare and contrast about The Battle of the Alamo and the Goliad Massacre. They have different people involved, different purposes, different outcomes, and more. Some of them are even