Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike business analysis
Nike business analysis
Chapter 4 analysis of financial statement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike business analysis
Executive Summary
Introduction
Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual-fund management firm, was considering buying share for the fund she managed, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, with an emphasis on value investing.
Ford held an analysts’ meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results and most importantly, to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Nike had maintained revenue of about 9 billion since 1997. However, its net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million. Moreover, Nike’s market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48% since 1997 to 42% in 2000.
In order to boost revenue, management decided to develop more athletic-shoe products in the midpriced segment which are sold for $70-$90 a pair. As for the cost side to be considered, Nike planned to exert more effort on expense control. The company executives forecasted that their long-term revenue-growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings-growth targets of above 15%.
In order to decide on an investment decision regarding the mutual fund she managed, Ford decided to develop her own discounted cash flow forecast.
Since Ford was not sure whether to buy stocks, she asked Cohen to estimate Nike’s weighted average cost of capital.
Obviously, this case aims to evaluate Joanna’s analysis. Throughout the analysis, we will estimate the cost of debt, cost of equity, and cost of capital through different financial analysis models.
WACC Approach
WACC is the weighted average return on capital that includes both cost of debt and equity, whereby we discount total cash flows by the appropriate discount rates
By using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Cohen calculated a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 8.4%.
...
... middle of paper ...
...is model wouldn’t fit into this case simply because it does not take the growth factor into consideration and therefore, it is considered inconsistent here and should be not used in computing the cost of capital.
The final model used to compute the cost of capital was the earning capitalization model. The problem with this model is that it does not take into consideration the growth of the company. Therefore we chose to reject this calculation. The earnings capitalization model calculations were found this way:
ECM
ECM = E1/Po
216/42.09
5.31%
Recommendation
The sensitivity analysis revealed that Nike was undervalued at a discount rates below 11.17%, when we calculated the WACC our solution was 9.87%. Any estimate below the prescribed discount rate means the stock is undervalued, therefore, it is undervalued and this implies that Nike is a buy stock.
In order to do this the WACC approach will be used based on the assumption that leverage will stay constant after 2012. Industry average of debt/value is 28.1 percent and debt/equity 71.9 percent. These figures will be used as an estimate for long-term leverage because it is expected that AirThread will maintain a leverage ratio that is constant with the industry. From this the relevered equity beta is found to be 0.9847 which will give an equity rate of return of 9.42 percent. The rate of return on debt will be 5.5 percent. This is the percentage of debt because it is the interest rate of the 10 year U.S. Treasury bond. The WACC is now found to be 7.80 percent. Next, the long-term growth rate of 2.9 percent will be assumed to stay constant. In order to determine the FCF 2013 FCF 2012 of $315.60 will be multiplied by the growth rate. This will give a FCF 2013 of $323.48. The FCF 2013 will then be divided by the WACC minus growth rate. By doing this the PV of terminal value is found to be approximately $4.6 billion. To see the calculations for this step refer to Exhibit 3 in the
First of all an analysis of the packaging machine investment’s hurdle rate is required. I will use comparable firm parameters approach to figure out the hurdle rate (WACC) of the firm using the information provided in Exhibit 5. The cost of debt should be calculated using the bond information given in footnote 2 of case under Exhibit 2. The cost of equity should be calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model.
Based on the optimal capital structure analysis, they should pursue as 70% debt proportion, which will give them the lowest cost of capital at 11.58%. Currently Star has no debt in their capital structure, so these new projects should begin to add debt to the company. However, no matter what debt and equity proportions are chosen for each project, the discount rate of 11.58% should be used, as the capital budgeting decisions should be independ...
...d the cost of equity I made a sensitivity analysis chart for Cisco through which I came up with the target price of $32.50. This chart shows the different price ranges of the stock which could be possible if the Terminal Value Perpetuity Growth Rate went higher or lower compared to the Cost of Equity.
The many factors affecting WACC are: general economic conditions, market conditions, the firm's operating and financial decisions, amount of financing, business risk, constant financial risk, and dividend policy. These factors have a direct impact on the variables used in calculating WACC. Such variables include the term structure of interest rate, the risk free rate, the beta, the market risk premium, the firm's marginal tax rate, and its capital structure.
There are many valuation methods that could be used to evaluate this company. Finding a method that valuates the stand-alone value is difficult. The stand-alone value should be dependent upon the firm’s own assets and projected future income. We decided to evaluate this company based upon two methods: The Discounted Cash Flow Method and the Comparable Companies Method.
At the meeting, management revealed plans to address both top-line growth and operating performance. To boost revenue, the company would develop more athletic-shoe products in the midpriced segment3a segment that Nike had overlooked...
Assessing the capital structure of any firm is important for investors attempting to determine if...
There are numerous costs of production for Nike Company which can be placed into two categories: fixed costs and variable. Fixed costs are those that remain the same for all production and variable costs change with each project. The organization’s manufacturing process, machinery, research and development costs make up the fixed costs. On the other hand, administration, distribution, labor and raw material are the variable costs. All of these are required in the organizations operation to ensure that it remains profitable. Production cost for each shoe is between $30 and $100 and they are sold at $100 to $300. Therefore, the organization stands a good chance of making a profit (Nike, Inc., 2012).
The following content provided will include information regarding Nikes Inc. cash management strategies, which will include more in depth information from the previous group paper. In addition, working capital recommendations will be provided to senior management base on next year’s in the pro-forma financial statements.
This report is for individual or institutional investors who want to diversify their portfolio by investing in sportswear retail industry. Given the positive announcement of its high profit, it is suggested that JD sports Fashion Plc is undervalued and a final justification will be made in this report. The report will provide in-depth analysis of JD sports Plc. that includes the following content:
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nevertheless, Nike is an extremely diverse company with outstanding organizational structure, impressive marketing strategy, and innovative products. The organizational structure of the Nike Corporation helped them become a leading innovator for the world with creative apparels and shoes. Their intelligent marketing strategies assist them in advertising their products to motive their customers and sell them. Their innovative product motivates customers with great performance footwear and quality designs to take on any obstacles. The Nike Corporation discovers various ways to improve their organizational structure to inspire the world.
a. 1. What sources of capital should be included when you estimate Harry Davis’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?