Aesthetics Of Music Analysis

769 Words2 Pages

Form gives organization to sounds. It refers to the overall structure or plan of a piece of music. It is with the patterns, motifs, and cadences contained within form that help make music enjoyable to listen to. In Roger Scruton’s “Aesthetics of Music” Scruton states in Ch. 10 that form relies on two concepts, deep structure or linear and hierarchal order. Deep structure is the concept that most organized sounds have an underlying form. Deep Structure exists within language particularly in the study of syntax. In language deep structure is a theoretical concept that unifies other structures. An example of this would be how the sentences “Max loves Sara” and “Sara is loved by Max” mean the same thing and use similar wording.
Heinrich Schenker favored the deep structure concept that is present in grammar. Schenker corresponded deep structure to his own Schenkerian Analysis of music. He applied a two-level generative structure for melody, harmony, and rhythm. Schenker would analyze a passage of music by showing the hierarchical relationships among the piece’s pitches. He would then come to a conclusion about the structure of the passage from this hierarchy. Schenker makes a bold claim that all works of Western tonal music have the same underlying structure.
Roger Scruton disagrees with this theory of Schenkerian Analysis and deep structure. Scruton rejects it’s generative capability when he says “The ‘deep structure’ becomes another way of describing long range relationships in the foreground; but it does not explain them, still less show how they are generated from a root idea” (p. 323 Scruton). Scruton agrees more with Leonard Meyer’s idea of hierarchically arranged implications and closures in music. To understand this idea we ...

... middle of paper ...

...d, but about displaying how each work expands on the background structure in a distinctive manner, defining both its individuality and the works meaning. Schenker’s theory is criticized but usually misunderstood. It all makes sense when you hear Schenker’s motto: "always the same, but never in the same manner". The method of Schenkerian Analysis and the theory of deep structure would also explain why we can understand and predict the movement in a tonal, musical work without ever hearing the piece before while Meyer’s theory of hierarchal ordering of musical elements does not explain that.
Does this objection stand up to Scruton’s criticism? Somewhat yes, as much as Schenker’s theory on form seems to make sense in some aspects, he still believes that this deep structure is contained in every piece of western music during his time, which is hard for me to believe.

Open Document