Adnan Syed Of Murder Case

629 Words2 Pages

During the month of February in 1999 a trial took place convicting a seventeen year old boy, Adnan Syed of murder in the first degree for killing Hae Min Lee. Although, it becomes apparent to the observant viewers of the podcast Serial, a production of WBEZ Chicago, that there are many holes in Syed’s trial which draws the question, who was it that allowed his conviction go through? After all this trial not only contained evidence that with the new evidence gathered more recently can disprove, but practically contained fairly little evidence against Adnan and the trial was only held up by the testimony from Jay, a friend of Syed’s, and the lack of Adnan’s alibi. Also, to add on to all of the factors against Adnan it is possible he had a crooked defense. …show more content…

Asia claims that she now recounts information that could very well be used as a testimony in court in favor of Adnan. Asia says that not only herself, but her former boyfriend Derrick had seen Adnan on the day of Hae’s death. They had both seen Adnan in the public library that is practically connected to the schools grounds and that they would have seen Adnan around at the time Adnan was supposedly in the car with Hae. Adnan was assumed checking his email on the computer in the public library. Adnan’s alibi supplied by Asia not only proves he is innocent, but that he wasn’t even near the scene of the crime. Although the evidence seems to be game changing, the judge said that Asia can no longer be used due to the longevity of her testimony and can no longer be counted as legitimate proof. Not to mention that the surveillance cameras that the library had previously had is non-existent. And any other witnesses as well. This is extremely off, where were these witnesses during the

More about Adnan Syed Of Murder Case

Open Document