Accommodation Process

1447 Words3 Pages

In addition to the investment model, Rusbult (1991) proposed the concept of accommodation process to help explain conflict resolution in relationships. Accommodation processes refer to the tendency of an individual to respond to her or his partner’s destructive actions with a constructive action. Rusbult (1991) described four distinct accommodation processes: exit, voice, neglect, and loyalty behaviors. The four behaviors can be classified as either constructive or destructive and as passive or active. Exit behaviors actively aim to end the relationship by performing actions that signify intent to leave the relationship (e.g., storming out of a room during an argument). Neglect behaviors refer to passive avoidance of the partner or issues regarding the partner, such as an individual not acknowledging her or his partner’s feelings as a result of anger. Both types of behaviors damage the relationship, and are therefore classified as destructive. Contrastingly, the constructive behaviors of voice and loyalty work to benefit the retention of the relationship. Voice behaviors encompass active, positive communication in response to destructive behavior from the partner (e.g., consoling an angered partner). Loyalty is categorized as a passive behavior in which the individual remains hopeful that the condition of her or his relationship will improve. Although exhibiting constructive behavior may benefit the relationship, lack of destructive behavior appears to be more consequential than the presence of constructive behaviors (Rusbult, Verette, Whitney, Slovik, & Lipkus, 1991). Research on accommodation processes suggests that individuals are more instinctively inclined towards destructive behavior and, therefore, must exhibit effort... ... middle of paper ... ...from Rusbult’s (1980) investment model, in addition to a measure of accommodation processes, in order to evaluate individuals’ same-sex friendships. Participants also completed a measure of impulsivity to determine the relationship between specific personality traits and conflict resolution behaviors in friendships. Considering the research on the facets of impulsivity and interpersonal dysfunction, I formed multiple hypotheses. First, I hypothesized that higher levels of all four facets would predict an increased incidence of the destructive behaviors of exit and neglect. Secondly, sensation seeking would negatively relate to loyalty and voice behaviors. Third, higher levels of each of the impulsivity facets would predict lower levels of commitment. Finally, I evaluated any potential mediational relationships between the UPPS facets, accommodation, and commitment.

Open Document