Absolutism Vs Constitutionalism Essay

439 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Absolutism vs constitutionalism

The two types of political systems that were seen in early Europe was absolutism and constitutionalism. Absolutism is when the monarch has full uncontested control with no checks and constitutionalism limits the power between authority and government. The monarchs of absolutism claimed they are a chosen vessel of God and are meant to follow God’s will. Constitutionalism limits the government through checks and balances from other groups of authority. Both forms of government have their advantages and disadvantages, which can prove or disprove if they are better than the other.
Absolutist rulers are able to pass whatever they want whenever they want without having to have it approved by another group of authority. These monarchs were able to …show more content…

Within this system there must be a maintained balance of the rights of their subjects and the power of government. England converted to a constitutional monarchy in 1688 where they allowed a monarch but there was a balance with an elected parliament put in place. The monarchs are not allowed full power to prevent rash action from happening but their actions took time because parliament had to be called into session. In 1689 a bill of rights was written that limited the power of the British Monarchs and was accepted by the monarchs at that time. This bill told the rights to their subjects, such as freedom of worship, and made the monarch respect those rights. The advantages of both political systems are also similar to the disadvantages of the other. As constitutionalism can not act quickly absolutionalism is only acted through one mind and can act freely. The disadvantage for absolutism is acting that freely which is the advantage of constitutionalism where the actions are checked before they are put into action. These types of governments have there flaws and as of right now there isn’t a perfect government that balances their power and

Show More
Related

  • Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    In this unit, we learned about the two types of governments the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. We also learned about people views on these two types of government. The United States Constitution created a strong central government using checks and balances. Under the Constitution, there were three branches of government: the executive, legislative and judicial branch ("Branches of Government."). Under the articles of confederation, there was a weak central government with limited powers ("Transcript of Articles of Confederation (1777)."). Both the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution had many pros and cons. The people in the colonies either had federalist or anti-federalist views. A federalist is a person who

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Strengths And Weaknesses

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    Who would have more control? They decided that the whole nation had authority. This idea of "Separation of Powers" helped avoid one group having dominance. Sovereignty was to be divided between state and national governments. The delegates created a government with three branches, and idea inspired by the French philosopher Baron de Montesquieu. The Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches would check and balance each other. The Judicial branch could now protect our rights and the Executive branch could enforce laws. Congress now had the power to create and impose taxes. The delegates also decided that a group of people appointed by each state would choose the leader of the executive branch. Each state received a certain number of votes in proportion to its population, as determined by the census. The framers called this the Electoral College. The delegates also determined how representation in Congress would

    Read More

  • Five Monarchy Guidelines

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    Absolutism was a time in history when kings and queens would rule their countries with complete power and authority. The five guiding principles that monarchs used to rule their country are as follow. The first one is that, a ruler should rule their country or Principality with absolute authority, the second one is that, “Might makes right” which is if the ruler has the power to do something then they should do it and they do not need to explain themselves, the third principle is that, a ruler should us military force when necessary to keep a country well defended and safe, the fourth is that, that ruler should not be worried about whether or not he or she is loved or feared but instead should focus on ruling the country in the best way possible. The final principle is a ruler should elect an able body of advisors to help in ruling the country. The five guiding principles of ruling a country impacted the countries of the monarchs who reigned during the Absolute Era in many ways. Three of these monarchs that that used the guiding principle were, Queen Elizabeth I, who ruled over England for 45 years from 1558 to 1603, King Louis XIV who ruled over France for 79 years from 1638 to 1715, and Catherine the Great ruled Russia as empress for 34 years from 1762 until 1796.

    Read More

  • King George I

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    Due to George’s little interaction with parliament, it further asserted itself with a new coronation of oath, requiring each monarch to swear to obey parliamentary statutes. It established a mandatory term of office for itself, gained tighter control over the budget and army, and produced a Bill of Rights that guaranteed citizens many liberties.

    Read More

  • Essay On Democracy And Athenian Democracy

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    The system of government we have today was starting to developed centuries ago by the Athenians and Romans. Both governments were established with the intent to give power to the people, even though it did not always play out that way in society. The Athenian democracy and the Roman republic were two very different governments in practice, but also maintained similar characteristics in both systems of government.

    Read More

  • How Did The Enlightenment Affect The Age Of Absolutism

    1566 Words  | 4 Pages

    There were several flaws in an Absolutism government. These flaws include that monarchs believed that they were above everyone else, and that kings were harsh. In Machiavelli's The Prince he describes that, “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it,”. In this excerpt from his writing, Machiavelli is describing that a ruler has to be tough and mean and not nice, in order to be a good ruler. Rulers being tough in cruel was just one of the major flaws of absolutism, that drove individuals away from absolute monarchy governments. Furthermore, in Monarchies individuals were not given full freedoms and independence, and all the choices were made by a single individual. The ideas expressed by King Louis include, “The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide,”. King Louis XIV’s ideas shows that in a monarchy all decisions are made by one single person, a monarch. In King Louis viewpoint this type of government was the best, but to to others such as enlightenment thinkers it was flawed. All decisions being made by a single ruler was an additional major flaw, of Absolutism. Furthermore, individuals did not like how King’s believed they were above everyone else. The ideas King James I of England

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    1140 Words  | 3 Pages

    Under an absolutism based government, the people are ruled by a single dictator. A prime example of a government similar to that of absolutism would be the Soviet Union under control by Joseph Stalin. Another example would be Adolf Hitler when he dominated Nazi Germany. Constitutionalism on the other hand is a form of government where checks and balances come into play. There is not a single individual who is able to control the entire government. Sure there are people who have more control than others. However, these people are not able to make decisions that would shake the government to its core. Why? Other members of the government would veto the individual and ultimately, put a complete stop to the disastrous plans that he/she had in store for the government. Another belief of a constitutionalism-based government is that there is a constitution that has been written and put into play. The constitution is similar to that of a rulebook per say. An absolutism-based government would never carry such a thing or even think about it for that matter. As has been noted, absolutism and constitutionalism are completely different from one

    Read More

  • The Palace of Versailles and the Absolutism of Louis XIV

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    A state running an economy especially with trade will generally fall behind due to the lack of flexibility to changing prices. Constitutionalism generally will restrict intervention enough so that it is not state-controlled, although it is still possible it will be regardless. With absolutism, a ruler could choose to intervene as much or little as they want, which can be dangerous and means any ruler could choose to take over that aspect, and the result will usually end badly. Stability will always help economically and constitutionalism is more stable in contrast to

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Absolutism

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    They both have limitation and a certain amount of power given to the leader. The nature of constitutionalism is based on limitations, and absolutism has minor similarities. Defenders of Absolutism such as Louis XIV, the divine ruler, had supreme power of the absolutist government, but was still limited on the restraint and fear of God based on his rule. With constitutionalism, limitations are there to keep leaders “in line” and can only be in power with the consent of the people. John locke shows us what “counts” and what doesn’t in the second treatise which gives us the limited government. The purpose is also similar because the purpose is still to keep a centralized government however one is just much more limited than the other based on rules and not morals. The biggest similarity is that the leader still has power. Even if it’s a longer process in a constitution, the leaders still have executive power to a certain extent. The purpose is even more similar in the fact that absolutism and constitutionalism are both used to maximize effectiveness, but in different

    Read More

  • Democracy And Public Service

    1410 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another type of government is an association under absolute control. Absolutism is the idea of governing by divine right, in which the ruler can come off as believing they are superior. This idea can be the cause of persuading rulers to be better than other parties. As stated in A History of Western ...

    Read More

  • Industrial Revolution and Absolutism

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    So in conclusion it is clear to see that both systems of government have benefits and drawbacks. Parliament can help a country make better well rounded decisions and also keep a corrupt ruler in check. Absolutism, with the right leader, can help citizens feel more secure give the country a strong image. So in the end it comes down to what the people want and feel comfortable with.

    Read More

  • French Monarchy Vs Absolute Monarchy

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    In France, the people were oppressed, violated, and disregarded. They were no longer citizens of the state of France, they were simply subjects to the crown. Their absolute monarchy transitioned to that of a tyranny. Sadly, when Parliament lost power in England this exact incident occurred. As discussed previously, Parliament longed for a constitutional monarchy to avoid disaster. But exactly like France, the constitutional monarchy transitioned to an absolute monarchy, and then from that formed a tyranny. Starting at James I and ending at James II, the English monarchy was not what they had long desired for it to be. Many were tyrant rather than kings, and several even dismissed Parliament in order to escape the possibility of them being question and maybe even removed. Obviously, these two countries are more alike than would appear at first

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Absolutism

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many different ways to organize a central government (Melina para 1). A democracy is a form of government where the people have the power to elect the leaders, like in the current United States of America (Melina para 11). A communist government is where one party runs the whole government with a stern hand, like in present day Russia (Melina para 6). Both of these kinds of governments have huge differences in how they operate (Melina para 1). These are main government systems today; however, during the seventeenth century, there was a different kind of government that was enacted (Spielvogel 444). Absolutism was one of the governments during this developing period; absolutism is the type of government where power is in the hand of one king and he rules by divine right (Spielvogel 444). In simplest terms, the king has all the power of the nation resting in his hands (Spielvogel 444). France, during the seventeenth century was seen to be ran by an absolute monarchy (Spielvogel 444).

    Read More

  • What is a State?

    2335 Words  | 5 Pages

    Weber explains that there are three different types of legitimized authority. The first authority that Weber describes is the authority is rooted in the ancient ritual and tradition to conform to the principle authority of forefathers (Weber 1958). This is exemplified in the form of patriarchy and an inherited authority. England is an exceptional example of this because while many European nations had monarchy authority in their history, England still recognizes the royal bloodline and has a monarchy. While the position of the monarchy within the government has changed from commander and chief to the chief of state, England holds onto this authority by which they legitimize their state. The second form of authority, Weber refers to as “gift of grace”. The concept of this authority is that the legitimacy comes from a certainty in a re...

    Read More

More about Absolutism Vs Constitutionalism Essay

Open Document