Abolition Of The Senate In Canada

841 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Roles of the Senate and House

Abolition of the Senate

The Senate was created in 1867 under the Constitution Act. It was created to protect regional interests and to provide what George-Étienne Cartier called a "power of resistance to oppose the democratic element." . Today, Senators are appointed by the Governor General on advice of the Prime Minister. The Senate is the Upper House of the Parliament, where they consider and revise legislation, investigate national issues, and most importantly under the Constitution, give the regions of Canada an equal voice in Parliament. However, the most important part, "giving the regions of Canada an equal voice in Parliament", is not being fulfilled. It's essential for the Senate to be abolished.

Members are often given seats …show more content…

As mentioned earlier, the Senate considers and revises legislations. This is one major role they play in the parliament as a bill cannot be passed as a law without their approval. When bills are in discussion they are rarely ever rejected by the Senate as they have constantly been approved within the years. If the Senate is going to endlessly approve every single bill and never the less, make any revision to old legislation to modernize with the world today, then what is the point of having the Senate? They are a useless extra step taken before a bill can be passed. Due to the Senate being recommended by the Prime Minister, they will always be in favour with their decision, disregarding any objection they may have at the back of their heads. If they were to be voted in by the people they would not feel as if they had an obligation to agree with the House of Commons and would actually think about what's best for the people. The Senate is no place for a modern democracy like …show more content…

Senators drain the tax money given by overspending it on unnecessary things, as well as the need to repay damages caused by their scandals. For example, Mike Duffy and Patrick Brazeau who were Conservative Senators had to repay $9,000 and $148,745 in expenses for their scandals. They were both accused of fraudulently declaring primary residence to claim living expenses for time working in Ottawa. Duffy was also charged by the RCMP with 31 offenses and in addition to that Brazeau was temporarily suspended from the Senate due to assault and sexual assault, as well as the charges of fraud and breach were being withheld against him. Brazeau's and Duffy's charges regarding fraud and breach were withdrawn by the Crown. As apart of Brazeau's plea deal he had pleaded guilty to simple assault and drug possession in which many assault charges were dropped and sexual assault charges were acquitted for. Duffy and Brazeau were both immediately able to return to the Senate in 2016. These are the type of people in our Senate; people who waste money due to their scandals and these people are not facing any consequences for their actions. They return to the Senate without any disregard of what had

Show More
Related

  • Quebec and the Meech Lake Accord Negotiations

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, this agreement was never reached at when two provinces, Newfoundland and Manitoba, failed to ratify it within the three year period that ended on June 1990 (Parkinson 1). These five conditions included the guaranteeing of Quebec a special status as a distinct society, increasing its provin...

    Read More

  • Indian Act Pros And Cons

    444 Words  | 1 Pages

    #8 I think the main goal of this act was to control Natives and assimilate them into Canada, and to bring First Nations’ status to an end. The act brought together all of Canada’s legislation governing First Nation people, which defined who Aboriginals were under Canadian law and set out the process by which people would cease to be Aboriginals. Under the act, the Canadian government assumed control of First Nation people’s governments, economy, religion, land, education, and even their personal lives.

    Read More

  • History Of The Statute Of Westminster

    1327 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... of their prospect. Until 1982, the power to amend the Canadian constitution thus would remain that of the parliament of Britain.

    Read More

  • Quebec 1995 Referendum

    1961 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Quebec referendum that was held in 1995 was a second round of vote that was meant to give the residents of the Quebec province in Canada the chance to determine whether they wanted to secede from Canada and thus establish Quebec as a sovereign state. Quebec has had a long history of wanting to secede from Canada, considering that it is the Canadian providence that is predominantly inhabited by the French-speaking people, whose political relationship with the rest of the Canadian provinces, mostly inhabited by the English-speaking people has been characterized by conflicting ideologies . Thus, the 1995 referendum was not the first political attempt to have Quebec gain its own independence. The discussion holds that the Quebec 1995 referendum would have had both positive and negative implications. Therefore, this discussion seeks to analyze the political consequences that would have f...

    Read More

  • Stephen Harper Open Federalism

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Confederation Settlement was inscribed in the British North America Act, 1867. The principle crafter of the document, Sir John A. Macdonald, “intended the new country be a highly centralized federation” (Dyck, 433), and thus the notion of Canadian federalism was birthed. The Founding Fathers modeled Canadian federalism from mercantile monarchy, Court Whigs, and from a renewal of counter-revolutionary transplant (Gagnon, 22 – 25). In February of 1865 at a debate in the Parliament of United Canada, the Fathers of Confederation proposed their model: “We have formed a scheme of government which united the advantages of both giving us the strength of a legislative union and the sectorial freedom of a federal union” (Parliamentary Debates, 32). The Confederation Settlement “consisted of five principal components: the division of powers between the central and provincial governments, the division of financial resources, federal controls imposed on the provinces, provincial representation in the central institutions, and certain cultural guarantees” (Dyck, 433).

    Read More

  • Senate Reform In Canada

    2054 Words  | 5 Pages

    Senate reform in Canada has been a popular topic for decades but has yet to be accomplished. Since the Senates formation in 1867 there has been numerous people who call for its reform or abolishment due to the fact it has not changed since its implementation and does not appear to be fulfilling its original role. An impediment to this request is that a constitutional amendment is needed to change the structure of the Senate, which is not an easy feat. Senate reform ideas have developed from other upper houses in counties such as the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany. From those two different successful governments emerges examples of different electoral systems, state representation, and methods of passing legislations.

    Read More

  • The Dangers Of Factionalism In Canada

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    While having a legislative Union is preferable to him, it is not practical (Ajzenstat, 1999, 281). Like the American Founders, he acknowledged that not everyone has the same interests and values and it is not possible to eliminate these differences between citizens. The Canadian federal system instead has a legislative union while maintaining sectional freedom that comes with a federal union, with decreased threat of Factionalism because of the ensured protection of local interests. Both the Founding Fathers and Canadian Founders agree that it is best to protect as many local interests as possible because this provides lesser chance of a majority infringing upon a minority. Giving minorities avenues to express their interests and ensure their voices are being heard decreases the likelihood of Factionalism causing the breakdown of a

    Read More

  • Western Alienation In Canada

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    Furthermore, the issues of representation in the House of Commons are even more evident in terms of the alienation of certain provinces. Western Canada has experienced political alienation due to the dominance and influence of Ontario and Quebec over policy-making as both provinces contain the founding Cultures of Canada (Miljan, 2012, p. 53) Also, the fact that Ontario and Quebec make up more than 60 percent of Canada’s population attracts policymakers to those provinces while marginalizing the interests of westerners (Miljan, 2012, p. 53). Thus, policymakers will favor Ontario and Quebec as these provinces harbor the most ridings as well as the bigger electors’ base. In fact, Western Canada is also underrepresented in both the House of Commons and the Senate when compared to the Maritime provinces as the Maritime provinces are overrepresented compared to their population. Also, many western Canadians are turned off by the federal government as they have been alienated from major political action and discussion due to low representation (Canada and the World Backgrounder, 2002). In other words, Ottawa does not address the needs and hopes of Western Canada

    Read More

  • The Canadian Governing System is not Fair or Democratic

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Canada itself claims to be democratic, yet the Canadian Senate is appointed to office by the current Prime Minister rather than elected by the citizens. The original purpose of the Senate was to give fair representation between provinces and to the citizens. Having failed its purpose, clearly there are issues within the Senate that need to be addressed. Because of the Prime Minister appointing the Senators, they will now serve the Prime Ministers needs rather than the people who they should have been listening to. As if this were not enough of a show of power for the Prime Minister, the Senators cannot be lawfully kicked out of office until the age of seventy-five. An example of Senate idiosyncrasy in Canadian government is Ross Fitzpatrick, who was appointed to office by former Prime Minister Jean Chretien of the Liberals in June 1990. His official opponent, Preston Manning, rightfully questioned the circumstances regardin...

    Read More

  • 1837 Rebellion

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    Short term consequences would lead to long term benefits as the attempts of a rebellion in 1837 demonstrated. The efforts of Upper and Lower Canada were “two parallel, separate movements”1 attempting to reform the broken political system in which the British government reigned supreme. This was a system where the French-Canadians were denied real power and control over their own government; where all the real power lies in the British governors. While the French aims to regain power over their economy and culture, the British would continue to deny them their wish while hoping to assimilate the French-Canadian culture altogether.2 At this point, assimilation was a very real threat seeing how the French were overpowered by the British both in terms of hierarchy and in terms of numbers. In the state of affairs, two prominent groups were in clear opposition: the Patriotes, lead by Papineau, were French-Canadians who put their efforts in hopes for, whom strives for, a government where the French majority (as it was in Lower Canada) could have a say in regards to colonial affairs.3 On the contrary, The Chateau Clique was composed of elites that would make up the Legislative Council, leaving the Legislative Assembly that composed of French-Canadians powerless. The injustice of the system was bound to fuel the Patriotes’ motivation in bringing a reformation of government. This was one of 3 equally important factors that would result in the the rebellions in Lower Canada: “a desire to develop democratic political institutions, an exploitation of the colony’s economy, and the creation of a colonial identity” 4

    Read More

  • Quebec Separatism

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.

    Read More

  • Regionalism in Canada

    1815 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will prove how regionalism is a prominent feature of Canadian life, and affects the legislative institutions, especially the Senate, electoral system, and party system as well as the agendas of the political parties the most. This paper will examine the influence of regionalism on Canada’s legislative institutions and agendas of political part...

    Read More

  • Quebec Nationalism

    1698 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper, I plan to take a deeper look at this situation and try to figure out what it would actually be like if Quebec was its own country. & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbs The premier of Quebec, Lucien Bouchard, has been attempting to separate from Canada for quite sometime. If he had it his way, this topic would be old news by now. His main problem is the Federalist, English speaking citizens of his province. They have been very vocal on their stance to stay apart of Canada. They have sent around several resolutions stating this.

    Read More

  • Canadian Confederation

    3837 Words  | 8 Pages

    The British North America Act went into effect July 1st, 1867 creating a union known as the Dominion of Canada, but this did not complete the debate on the Confederation issue. Many Nova Scotians continued their opposition to the idea and it would take considerable time before all Nova Scotians would accept the fact of Confederation. “These Nova Scotians, disgruntled at their treatment by Great Britain, found that their loyalty had markedly diminished. The more they considered taking over the responsibility for their own affairs from England, however, the greater trust they had to place in Confederation.”25 Confederation struck a balance between the rights of English and French speaking Canadians. Nevertheless, many divisions, conflicts, and debates would occur not only in Quebec but also in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick over this balance. Economic disparities between the Maritimes and the rest of Canada would also create many problems for the years following 1867. As a result, Confederation can be viewed as a beginning and not an end.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    While working in the House of Representatives and in the U.S. Senate hold different requirements their main purpose is to work together to form what is known as the United States Congress. Together they work to regulate laws and to form new ones when necessary. They are in place to keep the powers separate and to make sure that the power never lies with one group. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate play a very important role in the way the government

    Read More

More about Abolition Of The Senate In Canada

Open Document