Abolishing Prisons

1995 Words4 Pages

“The ultimate expression of law is not order- its prison. There are hundreds upon hundreds of prisons and thousands upon thousands of laws, yet there is no social order, no social peace” (Jackson, 1975). Over the years, there are many controversial debates whether prisons work or not, and if does work whether it works and serve the purpose that should have. In the following paragraphs it is going to be a critical evaluation regarding the case of abolishing prisons, and whether it is a solution of the “problematic” prison. Firstly it is going to be a critical assessment of the concept that prison does work and the idea of penal expansionism, then the criticisms for this concept. Moreover in the specific essay it is going to be a critical evaluation …show more content…

Michael Howard argued that prison work since it ensures that society is safe from rapists, murderers and gangsters, also it makes people who are tempted to commit criminal act to think about it more, as they know the consequences- prison. From this perspective it is already acknowledged that more people might go to prison (1993). Furthermore, according to Rutherford penal expansionism conducted when the prisons are “full” and there is a significant increase of the population of the prisons. When these occurs there are recommendations to develop more prisons, to hired more prison stuff and to increase the security across the penal estate …show more content…

These are consequently two extents of the crisis of political legality, penal legality and ethical legality (Fitzgerald and Sim,1982) For penal abolitionists, for example Joe Sim, custody could not be comprehended with no references to social context. In other words the social divisions sections and in general the structural inequalities that society have, such as poverty, racism and sexism. Because the imprisonment most of the times are towards the powerless, poor and vulnerable, rather than the most hazardous, in this sense prison does not fulfill its purposes. Thus, it can be said that they are politically

Open Document