A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nancy Mairs 'Cripple'

587 Words2 Pages

Nancy Mairs is a strong intelligent woman who uses humor to portray herself as a “cripple”, Mairs word choice demonstrates that she is proud of being who she is, while using humor and irony to demonstrate her condition. Mairs recognizes herself as a “cripple” although many people would not want to be called a cripple since they would find it offensive, but Mairs believes it fit her perfectly. Mairs does not like the term “handicapped” or “disabled” because they are not flattering which is why she prefers the word “cripple”. Although she has a serious condition she does not take consideration of other individuals statements, “whatever you call me, I remain cripple. But i don’t care what you call me” (Mairs). This passage demonstrates how brave and strong she is; Mairs is also optimism because she learned to accept herself the way she is, she eventually became confident enough to joke about her serious condition. …show more content…

This ironic phrase demonstrates the pride she finds in a label that others find offensive, but she finds it truthful and correct. Mairs embraces her condition because it has become part of her. Mairs continues to demonstrate her tone, now with humor when she states, “my God is not a handicapper general” (Mairs). Mairs uses this phrase to demonstrate she is different than most people including her god, but this does not stop her from being confident. She is aware of her difference but she knows she is capable of achieving all her desires. Furthermore she demonstrates that she continues to live a normal life with her family. Although individuals view Mairs differently she demonstrates her capability of achieving a regular life; for example, Stephen Hawking is a highly educated cripple who has achieved more than any other individual who does not have his condition. Hawking and Mairs prove that a disease will not stop them from living their

Open Document