A Critical Lense Of Love In A Midsummer Night's Dream

1101 Words3 Pages

At it’s heart, love is a chemical reaction. Norepinephrine, dopamine, oxytocin and serotonin work together to create a cocktail of passion, desire, and that heart-fluttering feeling of love. There are varying levels, of course, like there is with anything. Love that is short and fatal, and love that is long and everlasting. A Midsummer Night’s Dream, a play by William Shakespeare, seeks to explore love in through a critical lense of reality, and the blur of the fantastic. Using a particular sprite as his tool, Shakespeare drafts and builds a dialectic surrounding love that never reaches completion; that is, he never answers the questions he composes through the play using metaphors, characters, and dialogue. Robin Goodfellow, also known as …show more content…

His importance is underlined again when he closes the play in the first scene of the fifth act. Many mentions of nature are proclaimed again, but this time, they are all acting in harmony. The “hungry lion roars/and the wolf behowls the moon” (5.1.373), as would occur naturally. Instead of flowers and animals acting oddly and out of character, things have returned to normal; the fairies that commandeer these occurrences “[follow] darkness like a dream” (5.1.387). As Puck moves to “sweep the dust behind the door” (5.1. 393), the play closes in harmony and well-mannered dialogue. Puck begins to rhyme again, which also indicates consensus between the characters and their intentions. It is his ending monologue, however, that is the most important bit. This is what drives Shakespeare’s dialectic home. Puck promises to “scrape the serpent’s tongue” (5.1.435) all wary thoughts with his final message: All that has happened in the play is like a dream, because life with love is just that. Love is “no more yielding but a dream” (5.1.430) as Puck states. Shakespeare uses this ending monologue to “make amends ere long” to the dialectic he’s been constructing using Puck. Because he is “an honest Puck” (5.1.433), audiences are to trust what he says, as people so quickly do when love speaks to them in one way or …show more content…

Shakespeare, like love, is fickle and unyielding. He disguises his message in Puck’s line so that readers and audience members alike have to search for them. Much like the young lovers of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, too often is humankind blinded by what is right in front of them. Very few go deep enough to find the true meaning to the one-hundred some-odd years that they will spend walking the Earth. Why is that? Because, the truth is scary. What would it be like for humanity to realize it, as Shakespeare suggests, bases every decision off of something that might not even exist? Love is not tangible, or measurable in any quantitative way. Like Puck, it is akin to smoke in the air: impossible to grab with bare hands. It is natural like a fairy, and mischievous like a sprite. It’s blinding, capricious, and can be downright means. Still, people offer themselves up to pain, like Oberon and Demetrius, in the hope that love will let up and covet them as they do

Open Document