Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical views on King Lear
Themes of King Lear
The development of the character of Lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical views on King Lear
A Consideration of the Way Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Theme of Blindness in King Lear
Introduction
============
Throughout ‘King Lear’, Shakespeare uses the play’s characters to make
judgements on society using blindness as a metaphor that runs through
the play. He does this in a number of ways portraying characters that
can be fooled by others’ flattery, or are easily manipulated or
deceived, or simply have a lack of wisdom. As well as the horrific
physical blinding of Gloucester, blindness is used as a metaphor for
characters’ lack of insight, moral blindness, and a lack of perception
into other’s needs and interests. Shakespeare illustrates the
importance of seeing yourself and the world around you clearly.
Shakespeare shows how seeing clearly is linked to an understanding of
what the world is really like. As in many of Shakespeare’s plays,
‘King Lear’ is used to highlight the hypocrisy of social order,
whether it is the royal court, the legal system, or simply the family
structure.
Blindness as a metaphor for lack of self-knowledge
==================================================
The most severe form of blindness addressed in the play, is blindness
to oneself. In the case of Albany he is blinded by his own emotions.
His feelings toward Gonerill cloud his judgement, thus he is blind not
only to himself, but to the true intentions of Gonerill. However
unlike most of the other characters, by the end of the play Albany has
gained awareness and recognizes his wife’s inhumanity. On the surface
the audience may assume that Albany’s blindness is due to his simple
heart and goodness, but on deeper analysi...
... middle of paper ...
... characters in the play he ‘stands for’ a type or role
within the society Shakespeare has created. Kent is representative of
the hierarchy that Lear destroyed when he gave away his power, Kent is
an anachronism. The audience views Kent as a positive figure, and can
trust him, because of his sound advice and judgement. He is one of the
few characters in the play who are able to see clearly, and see Lear
for the misguided fool he is. Kent tries to warn him of his folly,
saying, ‘see better Lear’, and he begs him to remain, ‘The true blank
of thin eye’. In this ‘blank’ refers to the white centre of a target,
of which the concentric rings bear a resemblance to the pupil of an
eye. By making a comparison between Lear’s sight and a target,
Shakespeare is communicating the inevitability of Lear’s death at the
end of the play.
Thou shall honour thy father and thy mother, is not only one of ten powerful commandments but is also the foundation for King Lear's perception of himself and his overwhelming situation in Shakespeare's masterpiece King Lear. After a recent life-altering decision, Lear's seemingly stable and comfortable world has been thrown into upheaval through the disobedience and lies told by not only his two daughters but also by his servants! Thus, after being dishonoured by his family and attendants, Lear forms an accurate perception of his situation, that he is "a man / More sinned against than sinning" (Act III scene ii lines 60 - 61).
her bond, no more nor less . This response angers Lear and causes him to ban
Much of the imagery in King Lear's first scene presages what is to come in the play. Often characters refer to senses, particularly sight, whether as a comment on the necessity of sensing consequences before acting (as Lear does not), or as yet another of Shakespeare's comments (most apparent in Hamlet) on "seeming." The destruction of Gloucester's eyes and his subsequent musings ("I stumbled when I saw" (IV.i.19) etc.) are a more graphical presentation of this basic theme which originally appears in Lear's first scene. Goneril declares Lear is "dearer than eyesight" (I.i.56) to her (though she is the one who later suggests putting Gloucester's eyes out for his "treachery"). Regan goes further, proclaiming "I profess / Myself an enemy to all other joys / Which the most precious square of sense possesses" (I.i. 72-74). Crossed in his wrath by Kent, Lear cries "Out of my sight!" (I.i.157), only to be reproved with Kent's "See better, Lear, and let me still remain / The true blank of thine eye." (I.i.158-9).
Shakespeare’s tragedy, King Lear, portrays many important misconceptions which result in a long sequence of tragic events. The foundation of the story revolves around two characters, King Lear and Gloucester, and concentrates on their common flaw, the inability to read truth in other characters. For example, the king condemns his own daughter after he clearly misreads the truth behind her “dower,”(1.1.107) or honesty. Later, Gloucester passes judgment on his son Edgar based on a letter in which he “shall not need spectacles”(1.2.35) to read. While these two characters continue to misread people’s words, advisors around them repeatedly give hints to their misinterpretations, which pave the road for possible reconciliation. The realization of their mistakes, however, occurs after tragedy is inevitable.
this play so unique is the fact that Shakespeare incorporates all of these issues in just one tale.
Brown reveals in these simple depictions an understanding of King Lear that far surpasses anything the critics had to say about a play that was not at all popular in the nineteenth century. Charles Lamb observed early in the century that "Lear is essentially impossible to be represented on a stage," and at the end of the century--as in, for example, a review of Sir Henry Irving's King Lear at the Lyceum Theatre--the critics were still quoting Lamb and asserting that King Lear "would not be tolerated for an hour if produced without the name of Shakspere" (Illustrated London News 101:637). Small wonder that Sir Henry Irving was reportedly nervous and anxious when he produced this unpopular play at the Lyceum in 1892.
but seems to be a basis for a look at a deeper meaning of a certain
Lear, maybe a reason why there is no more of the Fool when Lear loses
In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, the issue of sight and its relevance to clear vision is a recurring theme. Shakespeare's principal means of portraying this theme is through the characters of Lear and Gloucester. Although Lear can physically see, he is blind in the sense that he lacks insight, understanding, and direction. In contrast, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the type of vision that Lear lacks. It is evident from these two characters that clear vision is not derived solely from physical sight. Lear's failure to understand this is the principal cause of his demise, while Gloucester learns to achieve clear vision, and consequently avoids a fate similar to Lear's.
Shakespeare’s dramatic theatre performances have long endured the test of time. His tales of love and loss, and even some history, make a reader think about events in their own life and what they wish to accomplish in life. Though written for the stage, Shakespeare’s plays have life lessons that readers of the great works can take put into effect in their own lives. Some may say that his plays are out dated, and are something of the past; though they were written in the 1600’s, they have morals and themes that can apply to life. “You've got to contend with versification, poetic license, archaisms, words that we don't even use any more, and grammar and spelling that were in a state of flux when the works were written,” says Pressley in an attempt to explain how to read Shakespeare. Once read and understood, however, one can start to compare and contrast different plays. The ways in which Shakespeare’s two plays King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing are similar out numbers the instances they are different, even though one is a Shakespearian tragedy while the other is a comedy.
In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and Gloucester's physical blindness that leads to his trusting tendencies. Each character achieves inner awareness at the end as their surreal blindness is lifted and they realize the truth. Both Lear and Gloucester are characters used by Shakespeare to show the relevance of having a clear vision in life.
In his tragedy, King Lear, Shakespeare explores the term “blindness” very meticulously that allows it to unfurl in order to reveal a more specific type of blindness in which he focuses on; a moral and insightful type of blindness. He uses two characters in particular, Lear and Gloucester, in order to express that being morally and insightfully blind to the true reasons behind another’s actions and emotions as well as being blinded to reality itself will only lead to chaos along the road. King Lear was blinded by Cordelia’s love for him and banishes her, thus leaving his entire kingdom under the reign of Regan and Goneril. Similarly, Gloucester was blinded by Edgar’s devotion to him and allowed Edmund to deceive him. However, as the story progressed,
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Pocket Books, 1993.
Through the issues of sight and blindness, Shakespeare develops a message that explores specifically, the detrimental effects of categorising people by superficial
King Lear is a play about a tragic hero, by the name of King Lear, whose flaws get the best of him. A tragic hero must possess three qualities. The first is they must have power, in other words, a leader. King Lear has the highest rank of any leader. He is a king. The next quality is they must have a tragic flaw, and King Lear has several of those. Finally, they must experience a downfall. Lear's realization of his mistakes is more than a downfall. It is a tragedy. Lear is a tragic hero because he has those three qualities. His flaws are his arrogance, his ignorance, and his misjudgments, each contributing to the other.