A Comparison Of Sigmund Jung's Great Expectations?

1053 Words3 Pages

What motivates authors? Do their inspirations stem from external factors, or do these masters of prose derive their storylines by projecting their innermost desires onto the pages? Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung present two theories that both explore these questions and relate to Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations. In Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, he writes about the concept of the “pleasure principle,” which is “the unconscious wish for pleasure or power” (497). Freud would agree that individuals’ greatest desires for obtaining power or the ultimate happiness stems from this pleasure principle theory. When something is missing in individuals’ lives, the desire to compensate for these deficiencies manifests itself in the form …show more content…

In relation to Great Expectations, it is possible that Dickens saw his own unhappiness in both his marriage and in trying to lead a double life that he sought an outlet in writing Great Expectations. Think of it in terms of what we choose to do when we feel the need to escape from the cruelty of our own realities—we seek refuge in reading novels with happy endings and watching films that lift our spirits, and we wish for something that distracts us and gives us hope when things are amiss. Take, for example, the ending of Great Expectations. Even after Pip’s misfortunes and adventures, the novel lends itself to an ending that results with all being right in Pip’s world and all loose ends being tied up. Dickens writes, “I [Pip] lived happily with Herbert and his wife, and lived frugally, and paid my debts,” and he goes on to say, “We [Herbert and Pip] had a good name, and worked for our profits, and did very well” (436). Upon reading how cleanly the novel ends, one cannot help but compare the ending to that of a fairy tale, as if at any …show more content…

While Freud suggests that individuals have an innate desire to fulfill their wishes when their needs are not being adequately met, Jung argues that individuals often project their own flaws and shortcomings in others. In his essay, Jung relies on an illustration of a child and his father to demonstrate the idea of projecting these flaws on others. Jung writes, “so true is it that every time he [the son or daughter] criticizes or praises his father, he is unconsciously hitting back at himself” (562). In other words, Jung points out that when children find themselves annoyed by their parents’ actions, these children are actually seeing their own imperfections being manifested in their parents. For example, Jung’s theory would argue that a meddlesome child may become quickly annoyed by a parent who asks a multitude of questions (possibly accusing the parent of prying into his or her life), simply because the child sees his or her own fault in being intrusive. Jung further elaborates on this idea by introducing the theory of a “shadow,” or a character who embodies the darker traits within an otherwise moral character. Jung explains that the shadow is “a moral problem that challenges the whole-ego personality,” and that the shadow “often behaves more or less like a primitive” (556). Perhaps the most convincing example of a shadow in Great Expectations is Pip’s monstrous adversary, Orlick.

Open Document