1968 Democratic National Convention Summary

780 Words2 Pages

The 1968 Democratic National Convention remains an important event in the nation's cultural and political history. The disruptive politics of the convention, brought about by the Vietnam War policies of President Johnson, prompted the Democratic Party to entirely refit its rules for selecting presidential delegates -- opening up the political process to millions. “The violence between police and anti-Vietnam war protesters in the streets and parks of Chicago gave the city a black-eye from which it has yet to completely recover.” (Mailer, N) The following articles provide firsthand accounts of the events in the convention and the riots surrounding it. Both articles use Ethos as a technique to form their argument. Haynes Johnson and Frank Kusch …show more content…

He begins by expressing how during the 1968 US Democratic National Convention, a protest activity was done by many “Anti-war Democratic groups in Chicago.” He explains that the protest activity was “their” way of expressing their anger in the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. Haynes Johnson shows bias in this article because he explains the impacts of the Democratic National Convention from the perspective of an anti-demonstrator. He expresses just how in its psychic impact, and its long-term political consequences, the Convention eclipsed any other such convention in American history, destroying faith in politicians, in the political system, in the country and in its institutions. Haynes Johnson wrote, “I can still recall the choking feeling from the tear gas hurled by police amid throngs of protesters gathering in parks and hotel …show more content…

A number of factors contributed to this use of force–the riots in Chicago after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., Mayor Richard Daley’s personal hatred of the protestors, and pressure from the local government and the Democrats to appear strong and “control” the protests. Kusch uses the police officers’ opinions to conclude that most Chicago residents supported the police and welcomed their efforts to protect the city, and backs his assertion with a tally of “pro-police” letters in the Chicago newspapers. Kusch himself seems to be biased in favor of the police, accepting the evidence that the protestors were “dangerous” as indicated by his repeated assertions that the protestors did not seek a legitimate form of dissent but rather were anarchists who sought only chaos. These conclusions are backed up by citing various corporate media reports of protesters carrying weapons, an imperfect means of supporting arguments as the corporate press has long distorted facts pertaining to

Open Document