1920s Women's Societal Roles

1126 Words3 Pages

Some viewed them as immoral and immature, but others welcomed the change. Between clothing, hairstyles, social roles, and behavior, the women of the 1920s knew how to have fun: but where should the line have been drawn? For hundreds of years, women were expected to be covered from neck to wrist to toe. Until the Roaring Twenties, no self-respecting woman would dare break from her corset, dress, and stockings. Then, almost instantly, all kinds of women seemed to forget the past and dressed to express themselves. Each change in women's fashion prepared the world for the imminence of a shift in gender roles. In the years leading up to the Roaring 20s, women's societal roles were only slightly changing, and their fashions and behavior remained …show more content…

They evolved from their proper lifestyle to one that caused controversy all over the world. The Gibson Girl fashions did not accommodate nightlife activities and social lifestyle, so corsets were abandoned, sleeves were taken off, and hemlines were raised. Women who adopted risky fashion choices and social lives were called "flappers." Long, beaded necklaces, low cut necklines, shapeless dresses, heavy makeup, and frilly accessories were typical attributes of flappers. Flappers' behavior was frowned upon by many because women were becoming openly "sexual," offending people of the public. However, Zelda Fitzgerald, a flapper herself, shared her perspective on the matter in "Eulogy on the Flapper" (1922): "...she covered her face with powder and paint because she didn’t need it and she refused to be bored chiefly because she wasn’t boring. She was conscious that the things she did were the things she had always wanted to do." Fitzgerald and other iconic women of the 1920s justified their new lifestyles by declaring their freedom to expression. Neuwirth, in her article, "Controversies of the Flapper," discusses an issue of Harper’s Magazine from 1927, which says that "a flapper knows that it is her American, her twentieth-century birthright to emerge from a creature of instinct to a fully fledged individual who is capable of molding her own life. And in this respect she holds that she is becoming man’s equal." Churches and politicians, on the other hand, were not ready to embrace the superfluous fashions, attempting to place bans on certain types of clothing and behavior. In 1920, a church in New Orleans sent a bride home to change into "modest bridal wear" (Lee). Laws were pending approval in over a dozen states including Utah, Virginia, New Jersey, South Carolina, Kansas, Iowa, and Pennsylvania; however, most lawmakers had different ideas of

More about 1920s Women's Societal Roles

Open Document