Analysis Of 'The Endless Hunt And Weird Karma'

866 Words2 Pages

For a reader who is trying to find a genuine understanding of the different cultures and societies around the world, the passages, “The Endless Hunt” and “Weird Karma” might not be a reliable source to refer to. In these narratives, the narrators describe personal experiences traveling to different parts of the world, which thus provides the readers a depiction of these places through their perspective. However, because the reader’s understanding of these environments are only given through the narrators’ insights, the cultures are not always accurately presented. The narrators in these texts distort the credibility of their narratives by providing misleading depictions of these areas that stray from the reality of their experience. An example …show more content…

This is evident in the way the narrator’s attempted to portray an authentically dangerous adventure conflicts with the actions made by the characters. When setting off on the hunting trip in Qaanaaq, she mentions that, “When we live on the ice, we eat what we hunt” (Ehrlich 93), implying that narrator and the other characters have no choice but to survive off of what they find in the wilderness. However, this implication is contradicted; when the characters stop moving to rest, she observes one of the people traveling with her as she notes, “Chris finds a jar of peanut butter. I’m dismayed to see the words REDUCED FAT on the label” (Ehrlich 95). The statement in the above quote becomes problematic as the narrator reveals that the claim, “we eat what we hunt” is not entirely true. This suggests that the narrator’s depiction of her experience is not completely genuine, and may mislead the readers from the reality of her situation. Furthermore, another factor that allows shakes the credibility of the narrative is the narrative intended focus on details that support her interpretation of the hunting trip. The “intentionally focus” the narrator commits can be demonstrated by analyzing the involvement of photographer Chris Anderson, a companion who accompanies her during the trip. Although the photographer is present through the story, he is mentioned significantly less than the Qaanaaq residents that also accompany her in the narrative; being only mentioned in his introduction on page 91, and during narrator’s observation of the peanut butter jar on page 95. Overall presence of a photographer, along with the narrator’s suspicious lack of interaction with him not only implies that their hunting trip is being documented, but that the narrator is attempting to distract the readers away

Open Document