Embryonic Stem Cell Research and The Survival Lottery Proposed by John Harris

2445 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gender roles and gender differences

Do we "own" our genes? I think so, but only to a point. I don't mean to sound crass, but would a prostitute "give it away" for free? I bring up prostitution because there's a reason it's known as the "world's oldest profession" and because I think as such it provides the most insight on the mindset I believe we have as a specie when it comes to services our bodies can provide. I cannot stress that I'm not calling organ donors prostitutes(though if you sell your organs you kind of are) and that I'm not trying to insult any group I talk about below. At the end of the day however, if you're talking about your rights to your tissues, I think the parallels raise themselves in the course of the conversations. I compare tissue donation to sex because there isn't a state in the Union that let's others choose for a person who they have relations with. You're the ultimate arbiter on who gets to put what where(sexually speaking). Yes there are still sodomy laws, but my point is there's no law that says you have to sleep with Jenny on the block or Johnny the Mayor's son. And jus primae noctis has been out for hundreds of years. So if that's the case in our society, why should it be different with your tissues? Shouldn't you decide who gets your organs or genes? The way I see it, if we have rights to any of the avenues we would pass on our genes or donate our organs then we have rights to all avenues thereof. Because there's already precedent in our culture("My body my choice!") of autonomy concerning one's flesh I don't see how an argument could be made otherwise. That being said once you release your tissues and genes I believe your forfeit all rights to them thereafter. This might seem the obvious course of action when ... ... middle of paper ... ... anyone has the right in such a case to decide how the embryo is to be used but the owners of the genetic material involved in its creation. Again, until the situation is different and we don't have a surplus of material we could be using to advance potentially life saving research the idea that we as a nation are purposefully not allowing the resource of materials to aid said research is criminal. No matter how much opponents might want to marry ESCR to abortion or pro-life debate all their doing is refusing to look at the reality in front of them. The potential good versus the guaranteed nothing that comes from such stubbornness should alert us all to the disservice we're doing ourselves by way of our representatives on this issue. It might save more tangible lives than we could possibly imagine. It's certainly worth exploring when we have the opportunity.

Show More
Related

  • Case Study Assignment: Opt Out Organ Donation Without Presumptions

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his article “Opt-out organ donation without presumptions”, Ben Saunders is writing to defend an opt-out organ donation system in which cadaveric organs can be used except in the case that the deceased person has registered an objection and has opted-out of organ donation. Saunders provides many arguments to defend his stance and to support his conclusion. This paper will discuss the premises and elements of Saunders’ argument and how these premises support his conclusion. Furthermore, this paper will discuss the effectiveness of Saunders’ argument, including its strengths and weaknesses. Lastly, it will discuss how someone with an opposing view might respond to his article,

    Read More

  • The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Essay

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    Most people live in capitalist societies where money matters a lot. Essentially, ownership is also of significance since it decides to whom the money goes. In present days, human tissues matter in the scientific field. Rebecca Skloot, author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, shows how Henrietta Lacks’s cells have been used well, and at the same time, how they have been a hot potato in science because of the problem of the ownership. This engages readers to try to answer the question, “Should legal ownership have to be given to people?” For that answer, yes. People should be given the rights to ownership over their tissues for patients to decide if they are willing to donate their tissues or not. Reasons will be explained as follows.

    Read More

  • Anthony Gregory Analysis

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    Yearly, thousands die from not receiving the organs needed to help save their lives; Anthony Gregory raises the question to why organ sales are deemed illegal in his piece “Why legalizing organ sales would help to save lives, end violence”, which was published in The Atlantic in November of 2011. Anthony Gregory has written hundreds of articles for magazines and newspapers, amongst the hundreds of articles is his piece on the selling of organs. Gregory states “Donors of blood, semen, and eggs, and volunteers for medical trials, are often compensated. Why not apply the same principle to organs? (p 451, para 2)”. The preceding quote allows and proposes readers to ponder on the thought of there being an organ

    Read More

  • Tissues... Does it Belong to Us or to We?

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin, the ownership of the tissue should belong to the person until removed from the body with consent or no, which greatly complicates the issue. To illustrate, the instance where Dr. Jones at John Hopkins took samples of Henrietta's cervix tumor to use for cancer research by George Guy was a situation in which should be justified as the best course of action Dr. Jones took (53). Not only did the tissue taken provide the medical world a vital resource for research and study, but also it failed to have any negative effects on the deceased owner, Henrietta Lacks, yet many people found it as questionable. Moreover, the abuse of tissues taken from patients cannot be ignored such as the Moore v. Regents of the University of California Moore sued because he did not want the commercialization of his tissue and his doctor, Golde, did not inform him of the financial potential of his tissue before requesting consent; however, these abuses have demonstrated that the lack of “informed consent” when requesting tissue dona...

    Read More

  • The Debate Over Roe v. Wade

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    because the right to abort, whatever one thinks of it, is not found in the

    Read More

  • The Debate Concerning Embryonic Stem Cell Research

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most heated political battles in the United States in recent years has been over the morality of embryonic stem cell research. The embryonic stem cell debate has polarized the country into those who argue that such research holds promises of ending a great deal of human suffering and others who condemn such research as involving the abortion of a potential human life. If any answer to the ethical debate surrounding this particular aspect of stem cell research exists, it is a hazy one at best. The question facing many scientists and policymakers involved in embryonic stem cell research is, which is more valuable – the life of a human suffering from a potentially fatal illness or injury, or the life of human at one week of development? While many argue that embryonic stem cell research holds the potential of developing cures for a number of illnesses that affect many individuals, such research is performed at the cost of destroying a life and should therefore not be pursued.

    Read More

  • Stem Cell Research

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ting embryos specifically for stem cell research should not be allowed. Continued stem cell research will benefit all of mankind with its promise of medical advances. Opponents’ concerns about destroying human life will be quelled because stem cells will be taken from already doomed embryos. The federal government will be able to regulate the research and ensure that it is lawfully conducted.

    Read More

  • Organ Donation Pros And Cons

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    The question arises about the ethics of making organ donation mandatory. From religions to freedom to fear, there are many pros and cons between the legality of the situation, but it all boils down to the freedom citizens have been given, which makes mandatory organ donation unethical. Lately, this has been an increasingly debated topic worldwide, as many people question the ethics of making organ donation mandatory. Organ transplantation is a surgical procedure, where a failing or damaged organ is replaced with a new one, either from a living or deceased donor. Any part of the body that performs a specialized function is classified as an organ. People can become organ donors by listing it on their driver’s license or signing a document with

    Read More

  • The Kidney Shortage Problem

    1392 Words  | 3 Pages

    Taylor, J. S. (2009). Autonomy and organ sales, revisited. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy , 34, 632-648.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of A Defence Of Abortion By Thomson

    1159 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, we have reverted back to the case of rape. If a fetus conceived voluntarily has the right not to be aborted due to how it was conceived, then the fetus conceived from rape should also have that same right. Instead of creating a distinction of cases where the fetus has a right to use the body of a pregnant person, Thomson instead makes a distinction of when abortion would be morally wrong.

    Read More

  • Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    2149 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...eadlines on a regular basis it cannot be denied the importance of it no matter the controversies that may follow. Life saving technologies is within our reach. It almost sounds as though maybe someday we can order body parts from our doctor like we order car parts from our mechanic. However, what is the cost? At first glance, one would think that this is an issue of whether an embryo is indeed a human, but when you pull back the onion, the issue is more ethical than scientific. If we do not share the same ideals/moral codes how can we agree on whether human embryos deserve the right same rights as you and I. Because both moral principals—The duty to prevent vs. The duty to respect the value of human life—are impossible to honor both. With that said, because our cultures are so diverse, there may never be a consensus between the two groups.

    Read More

  • Organ Sale

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today, 120,000 people are waiting for organ transplants in the United States. On average eighteen of these people die every day because they did not get the organ donation because of an absence of available organs for transplant. There is a large and increasing shortage of organs for transplant patients not only in America but in the whole world. Currently, the only organs that a transplant patient can legally receive are from cadavers or living relatives. This leaves patients with a very small chance of getting the help they need if they do not have a living relative with a compatible organ. If there were a free market for organs, it is believed by many experts that up to half of these patients would be able to get the transplants they need, at a lower medical cost (Adams, Barnett, Kaserman). The heightened medical costs, anguish of waiting, and thousands of needlessly lost lives could all be remedied by a free market for human organs.

    Read More

  • Abortion Annotated Bibliography

    1526 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are variables that could affect her choice. She could be poor, the child could have a birth defect, and so on. Giving her a right to decide whether she should abort the baby, it’s entirely her choice. What if the mother was raped or she got pregnant from incest? Would you traumatise this mother with the child of the rapist for 9 months, and would you allow an inbred child that will most likely have a disability and be put through literal hell?

    Read More

  • Organ Donation Shortage

    2036 Words  | 5 Pages

    In conclusion, although there are some valid reasons to support the creation of an organ market based on the principles of beneficence and autonomy, there are also many overriding reasons against the market. Allowing the existence of organ markets would theoretically increase the number of organ transplants by living donors, but the negative results that these organ markets will have on society are too grave. Thus, the usage of justice and nonmaleficence as guiding ethical principles precisely restricts the creation of the organ market as an ethical system.

    Read More

  • Legalizing the Sale of Human Organs

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    A human is born completely as he must end his life completely. No one on earth can buy a life. But people are buying part of a human life causing people to live with a body that’s not completed. In general, many people in the modern world are unwilling to legalize the sale of human organs even if it was a part of a dead human body (Mill, 2009). Also, selling organs is mostly against the moral values to some religions like Islam. However, in the modern world the increase of organ transplants is affected by the shortage of supply of the organs.

    Read More

More about Embryonic Stem Cell Research and The Survival Lottery Proposed by John Harris

Open Document