Education Goals For The Wide Population

714 Words2 Pages

Education goals for the wide population have a wide array of different ways to transfer knowledge, skills and background to the next generation. There are different perspectives all of which look at educational system and way society is interested in providing knowledge, skills required for a competitive job market.
First controversy in education exists on whether students are receiving high level skills and a good foundation in reading, writing and science from a functionalist perspective are interested in teaching moral values, social order, good citizenship, cultural values and social placement based on the expectations of society. Education focuses on groups needs instead of individual aspirations. The disadvantage is less rigorous foundation for reading, writing, science, and math and teaching the basics in education. The functionalist believe teachers lack sufficient training and their education does not prepare students for college, the workplace, and global economy. In being in a magnet program, many classes required group based projects. The controversy over group based projects was disheartening as a student. One, two or more people in the group would not participate in the project with the other students who really wanted to get a good grade. All the students in the group received the same grade as the students who completed the whole project. The controversy over invaluable class time was lost due to the work on a project.

Another controversy exists in the classroom is due to testing. Testing and labelling students through testing detracts from students who many not test well but with classroom instruction can exceed the goals. My sister, Sarah is a perfect example of the testing. Sarah did ...

... middle of paper ...

... accepted into STEM was a priviledge being a part of a social community of extremely smart and average students. The program is controversial since many students who are qualified for STEM are not accepted and often students who are accepted into STEM are unprepared receiving poor grades, cannot keep up with the coursework and often revert back to the regular high school program. The placement of students who are ill prepared for the STEM program is not beneficial to the student social leaving a feeling of failure and a lot to make up since the coursework in STEM is different. These student fail due to the fact of a weak educational background and it is a part of their self-fulfill prophecy to accomplish a successful course work in STEM. STEM perpetuates social inequality amongst high school students with only 100 of the 350 applicants selected for the program.

Open Document