Dystopia In The Handmaid's Tale And Kazuo Ishiguro

1323 Words3 Pages

The phenomenon of dystopian worlds is explored by both Margaret Atwood in her 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale and Kazuo Ishiguro is his 2006 novel Never Let Me Go. Information, individuality and freedom are restricted in both novels, resulting in the dehumanisation of citizens in their dystopian societies. In Atwood’s novel, dystopia takes form of totalitarian control; government has absolute control over all aspects of life, exemplified by forcing surrogate motherhood upon women with viable ovaries. Ishiguro explores a dystopian society that seems to be in the realms of normality, but actually is a world where selected second-class citizens are forced to donate their organs. Both authors cleverly portray dystopian worlds which are corrupt, …show more content…

Atwood associates her oppressed protagonists, the Handmaids, specifically to the colour red, to symbolism how Gilead systematically oppresses its citizens. Offred is illustrative, “...everything except the wings around my face is red; the colour of blood, which defines us.” (p.8). Confining the Handmaids to the colour red is brutally symbolic given their status as “…two-legged wombs” (p.136); readers sympathise with the Handmaids as they are objectified for the sole purpose of reproduction. Moreover, the pervasive use of red enables the Republic of Gilead to de-individualise and oppress the Handmaids, forcing them to wear the same colour, perform the same duties and act in similar ways. Red is further seen in the description of the “...tulips [which] open their cups, spilling the red colour” (p.21), symbolising the Handmaids' fertility. Serena Joy, the wife of Offred’s Commander, is seen “…snipping off [their] seed pods …aiming and positioning the blades….cutting with a convulsive jerk” (p.160). This is symbolic of destroying the plants' fertility, an indirect attack on Offred, her husband’s Handmaid. Throughout the novel Atwood uses the colour red to depict how the Handmaids are subjugated and oppressed by those of higher status; on the other hand, Ishiguro does not reveal who exactly oppresses the clones; there is no name to his dystopian society and thus only referred through a motif as “they”. Ishiguro creates an oppressive society in which clones are sheltered and monitored since birth, not knowing who has pre-determined the “fate they thoroughly deserved.” (pg.193). Every dystopian world needs a root of social breakdown stemming from a person or a group of people yet Ishiguro refers to this as a vague, ambiguous “they”. Kathy mentions “they keep us around” (pg.222) and how “they don’t

Open Document