Discrimination And Culture : An Argument Of Supporting Their Choice Of Intentionally Conceiving A Deaf Child Is Invalid

Discrimination And Culture : An Argument Of Supporting Their Choice Of Intentionally Conceiving A Deaf Child Is Invalid

Length: 1068 words (3.1 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Better Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

In this paper, I will be disputing why Sharon Duchesneau and Candy McCollough’s argument of supporting their choice of intentionally conceiving a deaf child is invalid. My conclusion is that Sharon and Candy’s argument regarding culture is unsound, since culture is not something that is learned but a birthright. I will summarize and discuss Sharon and Candy’s original argument regarding discrimination and culture. I will also present an objection to their argument, claiming that culture is not a valid dispute since any child brought up in a deaf family will be equally exposed to deaf culture.
Sharon and Candy faced much scrutiny after intentionally trying to conceive a deaf child through their use of a deaf sperm donor. It was only after an interview with the Washington post, that the couple were able to address the publics concerns’ of deliberately creating a child with a disability. In the interview, the couple explain how deafness is only a disability because society is set up in a way that does not allow the deaf to live a “normal” life. The couple attribute much of the hardships faced by the deaf to society’s reliance on spoken language. Sharon and Candy believe that the deaf have their own culture based on American Sign Language (ASL), and that life as a deaf person is not drastically different from that of a hearing person. With ASL, they are able to communicate with other members of the deaf community and their family members. Since their culture plays such an important role in their life, Sharon and Candy would like their children to be immersed in it as well. (Mundy)
Sharon and Candy’s argument begins with an analogy to other minority groups. They state that the deaf face similar hardships to those of women and blacks. W...

... middle of paper ...

... Candy to have children like them would not be so controversial.
In conclusion, I have contended that the use of culture as an argument for intentionally creating a deaf child is invalid. There is no reason for Sharon and Candy to try to ensure that their child will have the same cultural experience as them, since deaf and hearing children growing up in a deaf family would be exposed equally to deaf culture. Also, it is evident that, compared to a deaf child, a hearing child growing up in a deaf family would be better off in terms of the social, educational, and occupational aspects of life. Their exposure to deaf culture an ASL would greatly expand opportunities that would be limited for a deaf child. Therefore, I find that the objections concerning Sharon and Candy’s argument about culture are much more convincing than their original arguments.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »