Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dionysus personality
Euripides essays
Essay about dialogue of Euthyphro
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dionysus personality
Dionysus is not a god who Socrates could respect because his actions challenge Socrates’ beliefs. Dionysus deems gods most important and lets this fuel his revenge on the city of Thebes, which challenges the idea of piety and a pure soul being the most important things in life. Dionysus and Euthyphro represent the same character and the comparison shows how Socrates would respond to Dionysus as a god based on how he responds to Euthyphro and the jury in Euthyphro and Apology.
Dionysus obsesses over being accepted as a god. He begins his dialogue with “I’ve arrived here in the land of Thebes” (Euripides, 1). This is an assertion of his presence. It insinuates that he has an expectation from the people of Thebes. He expects the people of Thebes
…show more content…
Pentheus chains the women of Thebes and utilizes jail cells to emphasize his power through restraint. Dionysus combats this by setting them free. “Chains fell off their feet, just dropping on their own. Keys opened doors not turned by human hands” (Euripides, 557-559). He is setting the bodies free, which is representative of his superiority over Pentheus. Although he may utilize the importance of the physical body strictly because humans, or Pentheus, hold it most dear, he is still supporting this notion. Socrates, no matter at what cost, will not support the notion that the physical body is more important than the soul. Dionysus also drives the women crazy, and with that, they use their brute strength to tear apart animals and nature in the mountains. As the ultimate revenge, Dionysus’ women are in such a craze that Agave murders her own son, Pentheus. The murder is aimed to destroy the body, “…tossing bits of his flesh back and forth, for fun. His body parts lie scattered everywhere” (Euripides, 1410-1411). Dionysus gets his revenge, both on the women as well as on Pentheus, by focusing on the physicality of the world, because that is what he deems as most important. Socrates does not care for the physical world and focuses his life on preserving the spiritual one. His soul is his main priority. “They thought to injure me,” says Socrates about his death sentence, “they deserve blame for that” …show more content…
When the truth was not enough to convince his godliness to the people of Thebes, Dionysus reverted to violence. Similar to this, Euthyphro expresses that telling the truth does not convince the jury, but attacking the prosecutors does by saying, “I should find his weak spot, and it would be much more a question about him in court than about me” (Plato, Euthyphro, 5c). In this sense, Euthyphro and Dionysus are the same. Rather than sticking to the truth, they take greater measure to accomplish their goals. Socrates does not respect Euthyphro, he proves this by continuing to defend himself with the truth, calling his accusers “all those who persuaded you by means of envy and slander,” therefore he would not respect Dionysus either (Plato, Apology, 18d). This parallel between Euthyphro and Dionysus is also shown through their inability to recognize their own ignorance. Euthyphro claims he “would be in no way different from other men, if [he] did not have exact knowledge about all such things” in reference to divine law and holiness (Plato, Euthyphro, 4e). Dionysus, through his actions, is claiming to know all and does not acknowledge any ignorance he may have. As a god, he inclines he is entitled to his actions. He never second-guesses himself or his actions towards the city of Thebes. Socrates is the only one to admit he knows his own ignorance,
The power struggle between male and female in The Bacchae is mirrored by the struggle between the Dionysian forces and Pentheus. The conflict begins when Dionysus arrives in Thebes. Dionysus takes the Theban women away from their domestic duties and teaches them his secret rites, “I heard about strange new evils throughout the city—that our women have abandoned their homes for the sham revelries of Bacchus.” (Euripides 216-218). In the quote, Pentheus’ opinion on this change in the feminine role is clear. He finds the
In the Euthyphro, Plato describes the proceedings of a largely circular argument between Socrates and Euthyphro, a self-declared prophet and pious man, over the nature of piety and even of the gods themselves. The issues raised in this dialogue have been reinterpreted and extended to remain relevant even with a modern theological framework, so much so that the central issue is now known simply as ?the Euthyphro dilemma.? This is based on Socrates? two-way choice which he offers in the dialogue:
This philosophical study will define the relationship between morality and religion in the Socratic dialogue of the Euthyphro by Plato. The primary argument put forth by Socrates is to determine the causality of morality/piousness in and unto itself or by the approval of the gods. Socrates attempts to question the moral and religious authority of Euthyphro, which defines the important originations of the “moral good” through the command of the gods. However, Socrates defines the original presence of the morality/piousness before the gods can “approve” or disapprove” of its goodness. This is the theoretical position of denying the issue of "divine command” of the gods’ existence before morality/piousness, which Socrates refutes in the arguments
...ty since "things could happen in the real life of Athens which were virtually unthinkable in tragedy, and vice versa." Perhaps the safest assessment of Dionysus is that while not a direct opponent of the traditional ways, his presence, and especially his effect on other characters, serves to highlight many social norms. According to Bernad Knox, "From start to finish, Euripides was 'attempting to show citizens bred in the traditional views...that such conceptions of the gods should offend them.'" Perhaps we as readers will never fully understand the Dionysus that appears in this play, but a closing look at a remark of the Chorus may bring us a step closer to this understanding:
Euripdies' The Bacchae is known for its celebration of women's rebellion and patriarchial overthrow, claims which hold truth if not supremely. The Thebans, along with other women, pursue the rituals and culture of Dionysus’s cult which enacts their rebellion against men and the laws of their community. However, this motion to go aginst feminine norms is short lived as they lose power. When Agave comes to her epiphany, Dionysus is the one who is triumphant over Pentheus's death, not Agave or her sisters These women must be punished for their rebellion against both men and community. This female power is weakened and the rebellion muted in order to bring back social order and also to provide the story with a close. Female rebellion actually becomes oppressed through The Bacchae due to its conseqences and leading events of the play. This alludes to the message that women who do not follow traditional roles of femininity are subject to the destruction of an established society.
The Differences between Apollo and Dionysus are not difficult to see. Though both Gods are associated wi...
He establishes that “the pious is what all the gods love”. Socrates immediately asks a clarifying question, asking whether the gods love pious acts because they are pious or if it because since the gods love these actions it makes them pious. Euthyphro choses to say that the gods love pious acts because they are pious, which was a mistake in his thought process. Euthyphro committed the begging the question fallacy. Socrates shows that although Euthyphro is deemed an expert in this field, he does know understand piety at all. He has brought the conversation to the beginning by saying that pious acts are pious because they are pious, which is not an explanation. It is redundant in thinking, which is what Socrates wanted to avoid. At the end when Socrates tries to further push Euthyphro’s thinking, Euthyphro merely gives up and avoids Socrates altogether. Plato again illustrates the importance of applying rational thought when one ventures to find the truth. Euthyphro did not ask himself insightful and challenging questions to further push his idea towards the truth. Had he use rational standards, he would developed his idea in a much clearer
Schelling finds Greek mythology to be the highest point of mythology as it is able of expressing all three potencies with a degree of spirituality that we find nowhere else in the pagan world. The Hellenic representation of the three potencies is of them as the three different forms that the god Dionysus assumes. However, although Greek mythology acknowledges that the three potencies are one, it still fails to see the oneness underlying the different images of God, and how the potencies can be one without their differences ceasing to be. The three forms of Dionysus are separated from one another, and do not enjoy the same degree of oneness which binds the three persons of the Trinity. Thus, only with revelation we finally come to an understanding of God's oneness which represent the potencies in an organic oneness.
Many different interpretations can be derived from themes in Euripides's The Bacchae, most of which assume that, in order to punish the women of Thebes for their impudence, the god Dionysus drove them mad. However, there is evidence to believe that another factor played into this confrontation. Because of the trend of male dominance in Greek society, women suffered in oppression and bore a social stigma which led to their own vulnerability in becoming Dionysus's target. In essence, the Thebian women practically fostered Dionysian insanity through their longing to rebel against social norms. Their debilitating conditions as women prompted them to search for a way to transfigure themselves with male qualities in order to abandon their social subordination.
The relationship between gods and mortals in mythology has long been a complicated topic. The gods can be generous and supportive, and also devastating and destructive to any group of humans. Mortals must respect the powers above them that cannot be controlled. The gods rule over destiny, nature, and justice, and need to be recognized and worshipped for the powerful beings as they are. Regardless of one's actions, intentions, and thoughts, the gods in Greek myth have ultimate power and the final decision of justice over nature, mortals, and even each other.
Socrates was accused of bringing false gods into the polis and corrupting the youth. The only false god was himself. For he might have presented himself in such a way to his many followers. These followers were mostly, as he says, wealthy young men with not much to do. This I could imagine is where a good deal of his conceitedness comes from, being almost worshipped be others. These men followed all of his teachings and practices, including the condescending cross-examinations, which were probably the worst of his acts.
Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound portrays a greek god detained by a superior for disobedience against the latter’s rule. On the other hand in Euripides’ Hippolytus portrays lust and vengeance of the gods and the extent that they can go to to avenge it.
Before getting into the principles of Socrates, it is important to have some context on these two stories to understand how each of these exemplify philosophical understanding. “Euthyphro” is a dialogue between Socrates and
Imagine the time just after the death of Socrates. The people of Athens were filled with questions about the final judgment of this well-known, long-time citizen of Athens. Socrates was accused at the end of his life of impiety and corruption of youth. Rumors, prejudices, and questions flew about the town. Plato experienced this situation when Socrates, his teacher and friend, accepted the ruling of death from an Athenian court. In The Last Days of Socrates, Plato uses Socrates’ own voice to explain the reasons that Socrates, though innocent in Plato’s view, was convicted and why Socrates did not escape his punishment as offered by the court. The writings, “Euthyphro,” “The Apology,” “Crito,” and “Pheado” not only helped the general population of Athens and the friends and followers of Socrates understand his death, but also showed Socrates in the best possible light. They are connected by their common theme of a memoriam to Socrates and the discussion of virtues. By studying these texts, researchers can see into the culture of Athens, but most important are the discussions about relationships in the book. The relationships between the religion and state and individual and society have impacted the past and are still concerns that are with us today.
This is a reasonable answer on all fronts. Not to say that Euthyphro was not a holy man, but he certainly could not define his own existence- which is the exact sentiment which Socrates was trying to provoke. There is a clear difference between the definition of Socrates and the definitions of Euthyphro.