Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about new liberalism
Essays about new liberalism
Essays about new liberalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about new liberalism
Defining New Liberalism can be quite tricky. Some historians have preferred to privilege some aspects to comply with their vision of what it should be, rather than understanding the context and the classical Liberalist ideology they may have wanted to part with. The Home Rule Bill issue that resulted in Gladstone’s resignation was catastrophic for the party which lost a leader along with its unity of thinking. In this uncertainty a new current of thoughts had to emerge for the Liberal party not to sink into oblivion. It was to be a modern party, better-fitting to the new century and the social questions it had raised. Many theories have been made on how to define this alleged New Liberalism, trying to oppose one another. But to have an …show more content…
There was a feeling that ‘the legislation was imposed on the population’ , the social reforms were also trying to contradict this idea to show that it was Britain as a whole that should benefit from their governing and precisely not only the upper classes. These arguments all show a desire for New Liberalism to break away from their negative image in order to keep their voters, and so, come back to power, after the Conservatives had profited from the split in the Liberal party. But the reforms of the 1900s were not simply a cunning move, but also the result of a change in …show more content…
The biggest change was the methods they used: taxation was clearly not a classical liberal move, however their aim remained unchanged. They were accused of collectivism, however their defence was that individualism was still their motto in the sense that by improving the community’s well-being everyone would profit from it. They saw taxation as a matter of co-operation between the classes. Collectivism and individualism did not necessarily contradict each other in their minds. On this subject, Hobhouse said ‘an individual right cannot conflict with the common good nor could any right exist apart from the common good’ , because he ‘finds his own good in the common good’10. The notion of common good, away from class boundaries, was important in Hobhouse’s vision of New Liberalism because it was a way to attain self-realisation as well, despite Gladstonian liberals’ disapproval. He believed fair taxation would benefit everyone, yet disagreed with the Conservatives’ favoured indirect taxation. So also they seemed to borrow principles from the Labour and the Conservative parties, Liberals were actually opposing these principles and setting
It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...
Disraeli's Motives in Passing the Second Reform Act “The objective of establishing the Conservative Party as a party of
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
A Fierce Discontent by Michael McGerr delves into the revolution of values from the victorian era to the progressive within the late nineteen century to the early twentieth century. McGerr’s major argument is the contrast between this set of values. The gilded age which McGerr focuses is the period where progressive values begin to take form and societal change ensues. The victorian values are values which epitomizes the British culture as just the name of the era is derived from queen Victoria. Alternatively the progressive era was a political reform focusing on anti corruption, women suffrage, and fixing the social problems plaguing society. McGerr argues that the victorian era and progressive era strikes few similarities within the
Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the triumph of Reagan in 1980, America was shaken to the core by the Watergate scandal, the stalling of economic growth, gas shortages, and the Vietnam War. In an era that included the amount of turbulence that the 1970's did, it is not difficult to imagine that conservatism come to power. In this paper I will analyze how the liberal consensus went from one of its high points in 1965 to one of its lows in 1968. From there I will show how conservatism rose to power by the 1980 elections. In doing so, I will look at how factors within the American economy, civil rights issues, and political workings of the United States contributed to the fracturing of the liberal consensus and the rise of conservatism.
...es adopted immediately after the war it is clear that they were highly influenced by the Beveridge report. Mainly so through the implementation of Beveridge’s assumptions of the provision of family allowances, the creation of National Insurance and the implementation of a comprehensive health service. The Beveridge report further influenced the social reforms of Labour by providing a list of evils to be eradicated to which the Atlee’s government acted upon with varied success. To conclude, it is a fact that although the actual systems implemented diverged over the years from the model contained in the Beveridge report, the sheer impact that Beveridge had in shaping the post war welfare state was profound. In any case, without Beveridge and his organised plan of action, it is safe to say that the British welfare state would be different to that we know of today.
The Populist Party grew and their views on reform and their thoughts with the help of the Progressives became Amendments and laws. This period was characterized as the “ Age of Reform” my beliefs on this characterization was that is was perfect fit for this time period. The change within the country was for the better of the working class and the Adamson Act and the Sixteenth Amendment was the thoughts of the Populist Party but with the help of the Progressives it became what they are today. With the struggles of the 1893 it looked like people in 1920 where better off and they strived from that and keep moving to help create a better country year after
Thatcher is considered to be one of the most controversial figures in modern British politics and remains the only 20th century Prime Minister to give her name to an ideology. There has never been a clear consensus on the meaning of Thatcherism and it has been used to describe a vast array of ideas. Nigel Lawson, who claims to have invented the term, describes it as ‘a mixture of free markets, financial discipline, firm control over public expenditure, tax cuts, nationalism, ‘Victorian values’…, privatisation and a dash of populism’. Broadly, it can be argued that the main feature of Thatcherism was its opposition to the policies of the ‘post-war consensus’. Both supporters and opponents of Thatcher have created a pattern from disconnected
In Europe, 19th century, the ideology on liberalism began to become the leading reform movement. The principles of classical liberalism had become widespread in Western societies by the 19th century. This was the culmination of the political, economic, and social dynamics of the previous centuries. It has reached a climax or point of highest development in industrialization and capitalism. This eventually led to the evolution of classical liberalism into modern liberalism. In the 20th century, in spite of the growing of relative injustice of wealth, a theory of Modern Liberalism was developed to describe how a government could interfere in the economy to protect liberty or
In 1840 there was a new beginning in the fight for liberty the new liberals had emerged as a
England has produced some of the most well-known men of history. One of these men, William Gladstone, was a leading figure in England’s most influential century. The “Grand Old Man” served in Parliament for sixty years, holding positions such as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Prime Minister multiple times each. One of several ways Gladstone influenced Victorian England was economically and financially through his support in repealing the Corn laws in 1846, his successful budgets as Chancellor of the Exchequer, and through his first term as Prime Minister.
Not like classical liberalism, there is a certain compound of despotism within the modern liberal act. In the past, liberalism was used to literally emancipate people from the rule of kings and tyrants. Modern liberalism is now imposing its principles onto people who are not interested in focusing their lives around how their country can help them; it is a forced campaign that is behaving more like a tyranny than any other liberal beliefs have ever
In 1997, Tony Blair of the labour party won the United Kingdom’s general election on the ideology, goals and a party manifesto of a ‘new labour’, a revision, an update and a reform of the old labour party, bringing new radical politics to the 20th century - although some believe that labour only won the election due to the British publics increasing hate for Thatcher and the conservatives. The term new labour was a reflection on how the labour party was trying to reform itself and depart from the ideas of ‘old labour’ that had failed to win an election since 1974 and take on new ideas and politics that seemed radical, new and progressive and that would regain trust from the British voters. ‘New labour, new for Britain’ was the slogan that first appeared on the party’s manifesto in 1996 and soon became the party’s main slogan for the campaign of the 1997 elections. But how exactly was new labour new? New labour was trying to become more progressive with its politics that reformed all of the key policy domains that the government were interested in. By attempting to reform the party’s manifesto as well as clause IV, new labour attempted to become a new party that could progress British politics rather than rely on traditional politics of old labour. New labour wanted to modernise the party’s by perusing their traditional goals which include job support, economic growth, investments in public services, welfare and redistribution but they also wanted new progressive politics that catered to the minority groups in terms of social justice, for example civil partnerships (King,2002). However, some argue that new labour was not particularly ‘new’ and instead that Blair’s government had betrayed the traditions of the labour party and inst...
It was always very difficult for people to agree about politics in the 1900s. Many people wanted to make changes or improvements in the government to promote a stronger d...
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have