Popular Sovereignty Essay

1308 Words3 Pages

Most of the American people know about the Bill of Rights, but don 't know much else about our constitution. One of the most important parts of the constitution are the rules and principles that give government its power, if these were not already embedded in there would be mass confusion on who could do what and how much power a single branch held. Luckily the United States constitution, which is 228 years old, still provides a framework for legitimate government in the U.S.. The constitution can change with the times because of the six broad principles it is based on. Both Popular Sovereignty and Limited Government ensure the rights of the people. Popular Sovereignty is about the people giving some power to both the state and federal …show more content…

Each ruling the courts make can give new meaning to our constitution, and through the time it has existed courts have made important rulings on basic human rights. Any supreme court ruling is a good example but Brown v. Board of Education was a notable one that helped desegregate schools throughout the nation, probably one of the most important supreme court cases was the one that gave the courts the power of Judicial Review, Marbury v. Madison, where the chief justice John Marshall established the supreme court 's role in the new government. Federalism maintains a division of power among the national and state government, put inside article 1 section 8 and article 4 and 6. The individual powers of the national and state government serve as good examples such as Immigration, money printing, bankruptcy management, military requirements and the navy are all federal powers while alcohol restrictions, education, voting rules, speed limits, professional licences and the police 's power all belong to the state. Both governments do share powers as well like taxation, borrowing money, the protection of the environment, wildlife protection and homeland security. Constitutional principles are always connected to supreme court cases …show more content…

Wainwright is close to one of the most important supreme court cases to present day. In 1961 a court in florida tried Clarence Earl Gideon for breaking and entering and found the old man guilty and sentenced him to five years in prison. While locked up Gideon wrote a letter to the supreme court asking them to appeal his case because he had been denied the right of counsel during his trial, and they accepted it. The supreme court granted Gideon a new trial where he was found not guilty because of the help of a court-appointed attorney. The constitutional principles at work here are Judicial Review, Checks and Balances, and Federalism. Every supreme court case is Judicial Review because the court is reviewing to see if what the government did was in line with the constitution, it displays Checks and Balances because the supreme court is using its power to pull a man who had already been convicted by the executive and legislative branch out of jail to have a fair trial, and it represents Federalism Florida might have already given him a sentence but the national government is using the power it has over state government. In the end Gideon 's little knowledge about the constitution got him out of trouble and brought attention to the ignored 6th

Open Document