The Consequences of Secrecy and Dishonesty Illustrated in Shakespeare's Hamlet

1098 Words3 Pages

In theater, the playwright may write a genre that will enlighten the audience by teaching them a key moral. In the case of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Shakespeare inspires and encourages the audience to avoid secrecy and deception. Throughout the story, lying leads to evil and tragedy. It is evident from the tension between the word "withhold", which connotes concealment and deception, and the word "share", which connotes openness and honesty, that the characters exemplify the idea that withholding the truth can only lead to suffering, therefore teaching the members of the audience to avoid tragedy in their own lives.

The trail of treachery begins when scheming characters are forced to withhold information, so they shroud themselves in mystery and use equivocal language to mask their inner thoughts. Some suspicious characters avoid facing their guilt by using vague language that is not consistent. For example, Claudius suppresses his feelings surrounding the King’s death because of Claudius's guilt, as is seen from his speech to the court, he speaks equivocally by saying, “with mirth in funeral and dirge in marriage,” (1.2.10) steering clear of announcing his sorrow or contentment. By refusing to make a clear statement, Claudius’s paradoxical words are meant to confuse his audience and shroud his true feelings and guilt. Likewise, other observed people are confined to secrecy so they utter small pieces of the truth, but still remain ambiguous, which causes confusion and uncertainty. For instance, when Hamlet first meets the ghost of his father, the spirit hints to the truth behind the afterlife, as he says, “I am… confined fast in fires”, but quickly replies that it is retribution his sins, but then also states, “but that I am ...

... middle of paper ...

... Claudius is forced to witness the downfall of his kingdom, and is then murdered by the one he watched. Dishonesty and secrecy lead to tragedy and the death of all those who pursued the evil, yet if the characters had shared the underlying meaning of the peculiar events, many of the spies would not have committed their heinous crimes, or have followed their crooked leader.

Any action predicated on one character’s withholding of information could have been remedied by sharing the information. This undeniable truth proves that the curiosity of humanity can lead to destruction and anguish. The playwright’s motive is for the audience to understand this lesson and rid themselves of secrecy and unhelpful curiosity. The playwright’s parables are aimed to not only enlighten, but to change perspective of the audience, ultimately leading to the improvement of humanity.

Open Document